Yes, it’s from a book called “Uncle John’s Bathroom Reader” and that book was resting on a closed toilet seat in a nation that only kind of uses the metric system in certain situations… however, you’d be surprised how much you can learn after a single visit to any local fast-food joint!

  • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    6 days ago

    The paragraph on the meter should mention that their measuring error from the pole to the equator was .02%, which, without using satellites or even electricity, is fucking impressive.

  • motogo@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s so impressively thought out. I got my mind blown when the physics teacher told us that 1 calorie is the amount of energy it takes to heat 1cc by 1°C. Suddenly you realise that someone actually put some effort into this whole system

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      The one that blew my mind the most was finding out that calories are calculated by setting the food on fire, and then measuring how much it can heat water. Calories are literally just a measurement of how well something burns.

    • nightlily@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s incredibly funny to me that the two metric units that the US actually commonly uses (calories and Watt-hours), aren’t SI units. Those are both measured with Joules.

  • Hapankaali@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I think this snippet misrepresents the accuracy of the former definition of the metre. Sure, it’s no longer the distance from the equator to the pole (the modern definition uses the speed of light and the period of transition for a particular atom), but the difference is quite small. The circumference of the Earth around the poles (so 4 times the distance from equator to pole) is 40007.863 km. In Napoleonic times scientists had a pretty good idea what the shape of the Earth was.

    • brem@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      6 days ago

      Earth squeezes and stretches and wobbles & rotates. Time as we know it changes in length because it is the common nature of “time” to become chaos which then becomes order. Hylomorphism or Impermanence is to Entropy as measurement is to the fundamentals of size. Who is to say that the distance between two points should be constrained to the barriers of human existence & understanding. All we have is pictures & words, maybe a few trinkets that will become dust that becomes something else that attempts to quantify reality.

      • Hapankaali@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Earth squeezes and stretches and wobbles & rotates.

        Sort of, yeah, Earth is a bit wider around the equatorial axis than around the polar one.

        Time as we know it changes in length because it is the common nature of “time” to become chaos which then becomes order. Hylomorphism or Impermanence is to Entropy as measurement is to the fundamentals of size. Who is to say that the distance between two points should be constrained to the barriers of human existence & understanding. All we have is pictures & words, maybe a few trinkets that will become dust that becomes something else that attempts to quantify reality.

        This reads like an unfortunate confluence of psychosis, psychoactive substances and LLMs.

        • brem@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          While I can’t speak for my chemical imbalances, I can certainly assure you I am %100 not a fucking algorithm or some lame ass excuse for manufactured digital intelligence…

        • brem@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          34
          ·
          6 days ago

          Sort of, yeah, Earth is a bit wider around the equatorial axis than around the polar one.

          Thanks for explaining that a fucking ball is easier to squeeze at it’s widest part, genius.

          • MartianSands@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            What are you talking about? That isn’t what they said, and a ball doesn’t have a widest point. That’s more or less the definition of a ball.

            The distance between the two poles is smaller than the distance from one side to the other following the equator. The earth isn’t quite a ball, it’s a bit squashed because of way it spins

            • brem@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              6 days ago

              Okay, a ball is equally wide but sometimes it gets squeezed and becomes tallish

              • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 days ago

                Since it seems like you’re confused about the precise deformation of earth: the earth is wider around the equator. It’s not being squished but, rather, being flung apart by its spinning on its axis, like spinning pizza dough. Gravity just keeps it the same shape.

                If you’re interested, look up “geodesy”

      • creamfresh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 days ago

        To agree on a unified measurement system for things like engineering, science and commerce across nations and cultures is a question of practicability though, not pseudophilosophical ramblings.

        • brem@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          6 days ago

          I say we measure everything with how angry it makes the French.

  • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Love me some uncle john’s! Those page numbers are iconic, though I could immediately tell it was UJBR from the asterisks and writing style. Is this from “plunges into history”?

  • itisileclerk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    And the fact that Inch is not precisly defined. “Three grains of …” or “King’s thumb” is not a precise definition.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Precise definition isn’t really practically necessary. It’s only useful if you need to independently recreate a system in isolation. It’s much easier to have a reference material and just copy it. You can even build a reference length if you have something with known measurements.

  • SourDragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    Uncle John’s bathroom reader! I know this has nothing to do with the metric system, but I saw the toilet paper roll around the page number and got a surge of happy brain sauce due to the happy memories of all the copies I owned through the years: 2

  • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    The other fun thing is with the new calendar, they literslly reset the count to year 1. The coins for the first few years literally said “l’an 7” or “l’an 11”.

    “We decide when history starts” is a hell of a sentiment.

      • bampop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        It would have worked so well. 2 digit timestamp gives you 15 (old)minute accuracy which is just perfect for appointments and organizing your day. Digital minutes would be a bit longer than old minutes which is fine for bus/train times etc. Digital seconds a bit shorter than old seconds which is great for timing things. I always thought a second was a wee bit longer than it ought to be anyway.

    • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      “We decide when history starts” is a hell of a sentiment.

      It’s only consequencial if you want to get rid of anything that was imposed by the church.

    • brem@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I like that sentiment if it starts with us having the knowledge to be better than before

  • finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    So we only know a kilogram of water weighs a kilogram because of an arbitrary decision by the French? How much does it really weigh?

    • addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      It doesn’t even weigh a kilogram. It masses one kilogram. It’s weight will be something like 9.8 Newtons.

    • brem@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Ever since that dude translated the Rosetta stone they’ve been up their own asses.

    • brem@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Everything can be scaled. 1 can be two halves & 3 can be 12 .025’s. or we can all just agree that everything is based on various systems of measurement invented by humans who can hardly agree on their own origins and the purpose of their existence, or even the right to exist.

      • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I don’t think anyone can in good conscience say that inches scale to small measurements. Sure, you can use them, but subtracting 8/1000 out of something that is 1 5/8 and noting the final length is just unwieldy.

        You don’t need to get super existential about it, imperial was invented before we invented 0 and the decimal system and it shows. Sure the difference in basic units is irrelevant, no one cares what the meter or inch is defined as, the “superior” one is just what you’re used to and have an intuition for. But having units that relate to each other in round ways and can be easilt rescaled to the precision/range required can be nothing but a benefit

        • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Maybe you’ve never heard of decimal inches. Anything under 1/32" people start using ‘thou’ as in thousandths of an inch.

          Subtracting fractions is something you can learn. Children can even do it.

        • brem@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          Measurement works because it’s accepted on it’s own terms.

          If I were to believe that 1 is 2, it would be very difficult to explain that 2 is indeed double the normal amount of 1.

          The same goes for some alien species that has too many or not enough fingers and doesn’t use prime numbers because of this.

          I don’t personally believe that math is truly universal. But maybe I’m being existential ;)

          • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            I am genuinely interested in your take on how you believe the Peano Axioms could be shown to be false in this universe. They seem pretty darn universal, and have nothing to do with the number of fingers on your hand, or even how many dimensions you perceive.

  • micgerne@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Americans could at least have the decency to spell “metre” correctly, but no, they have to go and change the spelling of a measurement system they don’t even use.

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s called “meter” in lots of metric countries though (I know because I live in one).

    • fake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m willing to give them the spelling if they just adopt the fucking metric system.

      • brem@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m on the phone with them.

        They said they’ll do it after France or Canada does first. Not sure if they got the memo, or if they are just being silly again.

      • addie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Got two letter 'e’s in it, and they’re both pronounced differently. To be fair, it’s far from the most divergent spelling-to-saying word in English. Some wrong-looking abomination like ‘meetir’ would be even better.

    • brem@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Well…at least most of them pronounce data as DAY-TUH because of Star Trek.

      The other pronunciation is horrendous.

      Speaking of which, aluminum is pronounced fwaganah-schreple.