• adhdplantdev@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Maybe the political party should have conformed to the pressure of the people who vote in its party. Just saying.

    • Aabbcc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      Dems would rather lose than appeal to what americans actually want.

      Also funny to imagine protest voters being powerful enough to sway the election but not powerful enough for Dems to listen to

  • FediNeko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Coworker: “I hate trump, he should never be president!” Me: “So you’re voting Harris?” Coworker: “I don’t know if we’re ready for a WoMaN president”

    Asking for a friend, where is the nearest cliff? He would like to go jump off of it.

  • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    If only they’d put this much effort into getting one person to change her mind on the issue, instead of trying to get 10 million people to change their morals.

    It appears especially ghoulish now after it came out that even her campaign’s polling showed that it was a losing position.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Morals are morals, but they shouldn’t be completely uncompromising

      In this case we had the status quo on one side and on the other, someone who was itching to throw the dial to 11 across the board.

      At this point, any blood spilled as on their hands just as much as the DNC.

      • McPoops@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        What status quo was there when Dems allow the rollback of everything even when they’re in power without even the suggestion of a fight? Unless you mean the status quo of everything continually getting worse under either party’s admin.

  • McPoops@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Dem cheerleaders are blue maga. Nothing the Dems do are ever part of the problem; it’s always someone else’s fault.

    It wasn’t non-voters who forced the Dems and Biden to do the following:

    • For his first official act, Biden fought with his own party to prevent regular people from getting an already promised $600 check; completely ignoring the fact no one expected any PPP loans to be repaid.
    • Pulled a complete 180 on immigration, successfully building even more of the border wall and deporting more people than Trump.
    • Refusing to even entertain the idea of stopping Israel’s genocide in Gaza, even at the known expense of voters.
    • Declared the Covid-19 pandemic over by simply no longer testing for it, despite it continuing to overwhelm hospitals and kill people, all so that people could be forced back into work.
    • Ripped pandemic era support away from citizens that was responsible for nearly eliminating childhood poverty and food insecurity; forcing people back into $7.25 an hour minimum wage jobs with no benefits.
    • Refused to do anything about the increasing violence and state hostility towards queer people, especially in red states.
    • Scolded to constituents for not giving Biden enough credit because they insisted the economy was great (but only for the wealthy.) They ignored that inflation (caused solely by corporate price gouging they refused to challenge) grew more than wages. Sure, wages began to outpace inflation, but total inflation since the start of the pandemic is still higher than wage growth in the same period.
    • Made student loan forgiveness a means-tested application process that they then sat on for two months, instead of immediately clearing balances and destroying documents, as if begging SCOTUS to block them.
    • Doing absolutely nothing to restrict the unchecked presidential powers they worked with the GOP to expand for the last several decades, even as the threat of a second, even more overtly fascist Trump administration became more and more likely.
    • Dicked around for 2 years not taking the prosecution against Trump seriously and making this entire ordeal a possibility in the first place.

    This election was entirely the fault of the Democratic leadership. They failed. All blue maga does is try to deflect blame from them while they continue to screw all of us.

  • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Democrats are mentally incapable of even considering the possibility that their losing to Trump two out of the three times they’ve ran the exact same campaign and candidate is their own responsibility. No, it must be the *checks notes* people who wanted them to be a little more critical of killing Arabs who are responsible. Wonder who you’ll blame when Trump inevitably runs for a third term and you decide to copy/paste your campaign strategy and candidate because you’ve learned abso-fucking-lutely nothing. I’m betting “people who don’t worship trillionaires enough”, because we’ll have some by then.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s almost like the Israel/Palestine issue was completely irrelevant to the election since there were only two choices and both treated it the same. Yet only the Democrat candidate lost votes over it. Funny how they worked. It’s almost like someone engineered it

  • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Why are you so concerned with “protest voters”? If every third party vote went to Democrats, Harris still would have lost.

    It’s way easier to blame a small amorphous group of people, but why don’t you focus on winning? Harris got 6 million fewer votes than Biden. Do you think all those people stayed home because of Palestine?

    Take this energy and put it towards something useful. Ignoring all the facts so you can punch left is pathetic.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Isn’t that just non-voters? Not voting is viewed by literally everyone as “don’t care”, not a protest.

          • bishbosh@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Foreign policy simply doesn’t decide elections in the US. I’m sure there were some protests non-voters, but the idea that it was a significant majority of the 6 million is far fetched.

            • peregrin5@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Doesn’t matter. Even if they weren’t the deciding factor, they still contributed and were still idiots that deserve to be shamed.

      • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Those aren’t “protest voters”, are they?

        Again, Harris got 6 *million" fewer votes than Biden and lost by 2 million votes. If you really believe that’s because of Palestine, then you should be asking Harris why she didn’t support Palestine.

        But no reasonable person could think that Harris lost because of Palestine. So why is this such a big focus for liberals, instead of something that matters?

        If winning in 2026 and 2028 doesn’t involve punching left, are you even interested?

        • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Let me amend to say, I guess it depends on what your goal is. If your goal is to feel better about yourself & your political participation, then carry on. But if you want to get a Democrat elected, you need to stop acting like this.

  • spaduf@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Trump claiming credit for ceasefire and then destroying the region was always Bibi’s plan. The propalestine protestors were against the administration for refusing to acknowledge that the israeli’s were not negotiating in good faith. Had they played hard ball things might have been different.

  • _stranger_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Oh look at that, exactly what literally every sane person predicted would happen is happening.

  • Majorllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I would be curious to see the numbers but I don’t think the pro Palestine protest voters cost the Democrats the election. It definitely didn’t help, but the Dems shat the bed in way more ways than just the Palestine situation.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Pretty much. They didn’t offer anything their constituents wanted except for escape from DJT.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I question even that: Did they really? Where did the party articulate a cohesive plan (or hell, even just an enthusiastic promise) to counter the rise of oligarchy?

        They promised an escape from him stylistically, but the majority of citizens who aren’t political junkies weren’t sick of it, because they weren’t exposed to it, because they don’t pay much attention to political news. What did they promise that the non-informed voter would notice in they’re day-to-day life?

      • Majorllama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Unfortunately “We aren’t Donald Trump” wasn’t a winning strategy two of the three times they tried it.

        I wonder what two terrible choices we are gonna have in 2028. Watch it be like fuckin Nancy Pelosi with an exoskeleton holding her up vs Dan Crenshaw who will have replaced his eye patch with a gun by then.

        • McPoops@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          And, remember, it almost didn’t even work the second time. Biden was the only candidate running for the nomination poised to lose to Trump and he was forced on us, seemingly as punishment for us demanding healthcare. They were willing to throw 2020 and would have lost had the unpredictable and extraordinary circumstances of Covid-19 not occurred, along with Trump’s absolutely bungled response. Covid-19 was the sole event that propelled Biden to the white house. And then he was exactly as ineffective and terrible as all leftists predicted and we got Trump back because of it.

          • Majorllama@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I think both Trump and Biden handled COVID fucking terribly.

            Really most nations handled it really fucking badly. I can forgive initial mistakes like not knowing how potent it was or how infectious it was, but once they knew the masks were pointless why the hell did they continue to push that crap everywhere.

            • McPoops@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              It’s absolutely a disgrace how the Dems handled it after an entire year of Trump trying to pretend it just didn’t exist or was just a cold and using that in their campaign. Then when it became convenient for them they began to pretend it was over.

        • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Well, whoever it is, it’ll be them running against Trump, because he’s already hinted at running for a third term, and he doesn’t give a shit if things he does are illegal. And again, whoever it is the Dems pick, they’ll be such shitheads that they’ll lose the election against Trump again, for the third time. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever they learn their lesson in the next four years, because democrats are mentally incapable of even considering they could ever do anything wrong.

              • Majorllama@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                I was saying that the left says he’s a liar 24/7 but for whatever reason chose to believe him completely when he made that comment. But then they just go right back to calling him a liar when he made clarifications afterwards.

                It’s not that complex if you have a handful of functioning brain cells my guy.

                • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  I thought it was strange why you were defending Trump, till you started in about “tHe LeFt”. Now it makes perfect sense.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      23 hours ago

      If they did, then all the neolibs were wrong that voters don’t care about Palestine…

      Which logically means the party needs to move to the left at least enough so that genocide isn’t acceptable.

      Instead, they act like fucking trump supporters and brag that a genocide is still happening.

      There’s zero logic or empathy with them, which is why some people call them “blue maga”.

      They’re the ones that didn’t stop watching CNN even after the new buyers blatantly and publicly said their goal was to become the fox news if he left.

      • SoupBrick@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        19 hours ago

        You are aware that people can hold two beliefs at once, right?

        1. Democrats are not doing enough and were actively allowing a genocide under their watch.
        2. Inside our current system, the most powerful act a citizen can perform is voting.

        So, not voting and encouraging others not to vote because “blue MAGA” is actively helping the people who are currently enacting genocide+.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Inside our current system, the most powerful act a citizen can perform is voting.

          That “inside” is doing increasingly heavy lifting these days. Seems to me that increasingly the only successful change comes from working outside the system.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          18 hours ago

          See, this is where communication always breaks down…

          If a progressive is politically active right now it’s safe to assume that they held their nose and voted D.

          Which I’ve done just like I’ve always done.

          But we tried to warn people trump was going to win if Dems kept moving right…

          Dems kept moving right, and we were right. Then when we try to talk about how to win next time and how to gain back all the votes moving right cost us…

          We get people trying to say we’re the problem because we want to fucking win.

          So, not voting and encouraging others not to vote because “blue MAGA” is actively helping the people who are currently enacting genocide+.

          I got a big post history, plenty of opportunities for you to find a single comment where I’ve ever advocated for not voting for the least evil candidate in the general.

          But if you got a little faith you can take my word it’s not in here.

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Yes, it is possible to be extremely ignorant of the effectiveness of various political actions.

          Whether you are for or against voting, claiming it’s the most powerful act a citizen can perform is completely absurd. I don’t know a single informed person of any ideology who thinks this.

            • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              18 hours ago

              What is the reason?

              Maybe I don’t understand what you’re trying to say here. The way I understand it, it’s very misleading or incorrect. There are plenty of actions people can take that are far more impactful than voting. I guess whether those various actions are categorized as inside or outside of the system might be up for debate in some cases. But I’m not sure why you would even be imposing that restriction in the first place.

              • SoupBrick@yiffit.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                17 hours ago

                The reason I said, “inside the system” is that we need to use the avenues provided to us to try to fight back along side other means, such as protests. We need to unify now more than ever, so lumping everyone who uses the system to affect change into “blue MAGA” is only harming progress.

                • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  16 hours ago

                  I agree completely with the need to unify. I just want people to stop thinking politics begins and ends with voting. Even if you don’t want to do anything disruptive there are still things you can do like canvassing or letter-writing or becoming local party delegate and influencing parties from the inside. I largely agree with leftists that the system will never be completely transformed from the inside but it’s better than doing nothing.

                  However I also think we’re getting to the point where more disruptive civil resistance actions will be necessary.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Pro-Palestine protest votes didn’t cost the Dems the election, but that a single group was not the deciding factor in a contest does not absolve them of responsibility. IE single-issue pro-Israel voters probably were not the reason for Trump’s victory, but they still deserve a portion of the blame in voting for Trump.

      And many of these selfsame pro-Palestine protest vote types are continuing their dumbass games even as Trump greenlights fascism both at home and abroad - like everyone fucking told them he would.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        single-issue pro-Israel voters probably were not the reason for Trump’s victory, but they still deserve a portion of the blame in voting for Trump.

        Except they didnt vote for trump and it’s disgusting to pretend otherwise

          • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            So we’re discussing a tiny portion of people now to avoid being called out for the authoritarian vote bullshit now, eh?

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              So we’re discussing a tiny portion of people now to avoid being called out for the authoritarian vote bullshit now, eh?

              What is that supposed to even mean?

                • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Bruh, I explicitly made the point of “Being a small part of the problem does not absolve people of being part of the problem”, and your response is

                  So we’re discussing a tiny portion of people now to avoid being called out for the authoritarian vote bullshit now, eh?

                  Between the fact that we were discussing a ‘tiny portion of people’ from the very start and that ‘authoritarian vote bullshit’ is a vague phrase that makes no solid assertions except “vote bad >:(” for some reason, you’ve said nothing of substance unless there’s some means of clarifying. I offered you a chance to clarify. You declined.

                  Don’t really know how much more help you want here. I’m not here to spoonfeed you, guy.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Well said. I really wish people understood that blame can be shared because they really don’t seem to understand that and haven’t since November.

        • peregrin5@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          They understand. They just don’t want the blame and want to shift the responsibility for their irresponsible actions to anyone but themselves.

      • Loss@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Because the effect is the same. Sorry, again, you might finally experience what others have been.

        • recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          If you think this shit is gonna be worse internally than externally; you’re gonna have a bad time.

          But hey, you know best right? Nobody told you what would happen before, right? They weren’t all proven correct, right?

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Well many folks stayed home, and there’s no number for that (by intention…staying home is staying home) so it would be hard to quantify.

      But apathy in the face of a trump second term is worth discussing, given what was common knowledge about him by then

      • Majorllama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I think the 2024 election cycle failure falls almost exclusively on the shoulders of the Democrats.

        Yeah Trump and his bullshit obviously played a part in where we ended up, but I genuinely believe that it more so came down to how the Democrats handled things in the years leading up to and during the election. I know people want to shift blame and point fingers. You could even make the argument that I’m doing that right now, but the data says otherwise.

        It’s not like Trump is some generally beloved figure that was already super popular. No he’s highly controversial. Many old school Republicans and conservatives despise the guy.

        So how does someone that nobody on the left likes and significant chunks on the right also aren’t a fan of end up in the office again?

        At some point the democratic party need to actually reflect on where they went wrong instead of just pointing fingers and trying to shift blame.

        At the end of the day it’s the job of the party to earn the votes of the people. They clearly didn’t earn enough votes.

        Blue lost ground to red in every single state. That type of thing doesn’t just happen outta nowhere.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          I acknowledge that the Dems MUST change. That’s super true.

          But based on real historical information about trump, plus his clear intentions for this term, I would have elected an incontinent Chihuahua over trump. At least the Chihuahua would have just shit on the floor of the oval office rather than trashing minority/immigrant rights, climate/science progress, and health research and vaccine implementation all in the first week.

          So if there’s criticism of dems, which is valid, there’s a seeming lack of acknowledgement of the risks trump poses, which are in great excess to anything DEM status quo

          • Furbag@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            13 hours ago

            True. People keep saying there was nothing different from the Harris campaign that made her different from Biden, but when you compare the status quo, even the version of the status quo that Biden’s biggest critics were inventing, it would have still been preferable to re-electing the guy who tried to literally steal the election last time. We could have only been so lucky to have the status quo.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            So if there’s criticism of dems, which is valid, there’s a seeming lack of acknowledgement of the risks trump poses, which are in great excess to anything DEM status quo

            The inescapable conclusion is that, despite their rhetoric, the Democratic Party did not actually see Trump as a risk to the status quo – at least not the status quo they actually care about (their donors’ plutocratic gravy train), as opposed to the status quo they claim to care about (egalitarianism/civil rights).

            In other words, “the Dems MUST change” is a huge understatement. It also has zero chance of happening – other than doubling down on the “we must court the mythological Enlightened Centrist and move right” change for the worse – under the current party leadership.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I think the 2024 election cycle failure falls almost exclusively on the shoulders of the Democrats.

          You make some valid points, certainly. But what people are failing to recognize is none of that matters now.

          We had one day, or one vote to stop this tidal wave of evil and we did not do it. Did the DNC fail to appear on a sports talk show, or drive a garbage truck around? Did they not mobilize a nationwide caucus to choose the best candidate from every single human alive today with just four months to go? Yeah, i guess, whatever - it doesn’t matter.

          People who refused to stop trump because of Palestine helped ensure that situation would get 100x worse. And they were complete ignorant assholes about it. Dog forbid they learn anything from this.

          • peregrin5@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            This. At the end of the day the only responsible ones are the people and whether or not they vote for good, or standby and let evil prevail.

            The responsibility for this lies squarely with the American people. Not the DNC.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          That’s true but you can’t attribute exactly why, which was my point.

          You can make some correlations about identifying key issues to a given group, but you can’t guarantee their absence wasn’t just due to either not being able to vote due to work or some other legitimate limitation on their ability, or just being a shitty lazy citizen, or protest absence

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      22 hours ago

      It wouldn’t have been a landslide, but it certainly assured the worst case scenario, MAGA sweeping all 3.

      Who knows how it would have gone down otherwise, maybe the Democrats regained the house, maybe held onto the Senate. Maybe Trump would have lost, but Republicunts held onto Congress.

      Who knows, but any of those would have been 10000x better than letting Drump get a hold of all 3.

      Now everyone is screwed in some way.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        MAGA sweeping all 3.

        A lot of the House Senate races are likely due to the “victory fund” nonsense Hillary started and was then passed down to Biden and Kamala

        The way it gets away donation limits is using the max from state parties. The last time we got to see the books was after 2016, and states got like 1% of what was donated “for them” to the DNC and Clinton campaigns

        There’s no sign anything has changed, and the neoliberals running the party have no requirements to disclose them

        So I just assume if they’re hiding the books, they’re hiding grifts at this point.

    • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      23 hours ago

      What do you mean don’t blame the brown people for White America’s problems/identity crisis?