• imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Don’t get the MGS on the list. I, frankly, haven’t played all of them. Only TPP. And in there you are it even playing as solid snake. And, say, we consider this Pic as a Venom snake, so how exactly is he a bad guy? The whole point of the game is to peacefully remove arms from an enemy, nukes included. I mean, ofc you can go full Rambo and kill everyone and build nukes. But then youd be evil for doing so. Real game is to go pacifist and save everyone. How is this “I misunderstood the message”?

    Again want to mention thatI have no idea about the rest of the series. I would like an explanation.

  • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I once came across a system in No Man’s Sky with planets named “Griffith did nothing wrong” and “casca enjoyed it”. Truly a wild system.

  • DevDave@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It has been a long time but I remember feeling sad for Rico in the book. I don’t know if Heinlein intended it to be seen like this but by the end it felt like there was nothing left of the human being.

    • beejboytyson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Ya they both wanted the same thing but paul vanhoeven went a more literal path. The book read more like the recounting of a jar heads experience. Implying that despite the future having all these new toys the fasicm and ptsd hasn’t change. While PVH wanted to show how seductive and enthralling fascism ACTUALLY is. Most kids were down for genocide without thinking it through. Star ship troops is a propaganda film that seduces its watchers with sex, adventure, and style.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Who (and how did they) misunderstood MGS? Kojima isn’t exactly subtle.

    And considering that Venom isn’t even the real Big Boss, and Big Boss was only a true villain in the original Metal Gear, when he had zero backstory and wasn’t even cool enough to get more than a fucking placeholder name, it’s weird seeing him up there. 2 and 5 pretty much show his goal was to destroy the illuminati as well as take care of war vets who got fucked over by their government. He’s only a villain to the shitty fascist governments controlled by The Patriots. He’s way more of an anti-hero than an actual villain.

    It’s like calling Neo from The Matrix a villain because he killed innocent people who were tools of the enemy without their knowledge.

    • Mr.Chewy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Noone hears the word, they say. Has the memory gone, are you feeling numb? We’ve all be-come in-viisible

    • stoicmaverick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I think you’re misunderstand the meme. I think it’s aimed at Dude-bros® who only understand the superficial message which is obviously being disproven by the content. It’s making fun of people who have a Fight Club poster on their wall because they think the message is “all men can be hardcore, bare knuckle boxers, if the stop letting a weak social framework tell them what they want.” Or watching the film of Starship Troopers and learning “You can overcome any obstacle with enough bravado and testosterone.” I’m not as familiar with most of the animes pictured, but I assume the jab is the same.

      • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The one that confuses me is the top roght;: that’s Johan liebert from Monster. He’s an irredeemable psychopath who kills his parents as a child, and when his sister shoots him in the head to stop him from killing her, he nearly dies. Then a surgeon saves his life, only to later realize that the life he saved is that of the aforementioned irredeemable psychopath. Many years later, Johan returns and thanks the surgeon for saving his life, crediting his noble act with all of the murders he has been committing and plans to commit. The surgeon has to track him down to terminate the horrid life he granted so many years before (largely to clear his own name, because the psychopath kills someone and the cops think the surgeon did it).

        Johan liebert isn’t even really making a philosophical point. He just needs to kill people. The surgeon’s situation (is he culpable for the deaths allowed because he saved a life? Is it morally right to end a life, if by doing so you can preserve many others? Essentially variations on the trolley problem) is the philosophical question, so saying that there is a group of people idolizing Johan Liebert because they misunderstand the meaning is like saying that there are people idolizing the trolley. That’s not really missing the point. Those people would just be dangerously mentally unwell.

  • Aeao@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    23 hours ago

    My exwife has a large slytherin tattoo. That house in pottery is just “the bad guys”. There’s not charecter arch or deeper meaning, no complexity in writing.

    They are just the bad guys, who are evil and mean. That’s it. She loves em.

    • nullspace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      22 hours ago

      A lot of people have Empire tattoos, Decepticon tattoos, and so on. Fictional bad guys are just cool.

      • Sektor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        They need to be more than bad guys. Darth Wader started as good guy, than became a bad guy, than redeemed himself. Nobody normal has a tattoo of nurse Ratchet.

      • BreadOven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I love Zeon/Neo Zeon mobile suits. Don’t agree with the views, but damn do they have some cool designs.

        • Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I mean, spacenoid rights, which is what Zeon Diekun preached, was not the same as the as the Principality of Zeon, which is the Zabi Family dictatorship, and the ones that gassed and dropped a colony.

    • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Consider the alternatives:

      Suicidal, stupid, trouble causing and seeking, bullying “brave” Griffindors.

      Bookworm “smart”, swot grinders Ravenclaws.

      Sly and cunning, “ambitious” Slytherins.

      Neither brave, smart or sly, menial workers Hufflepuffs.

      Idk about you, but out of those options to me speaks the most “neither”, but if I have to sleep somewhere, I’d wear green.

      • hOrni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Dude, Hufflepuffs got it right. “Nobody expects us to achieve anything, so they’ll praise us if we just show up”. That’s a pro level life hack. They are the “take it easy” house. If The Dude was in Hogwarts, he’d be in Hufflepuff. If I was in Hogwarts I’d be in Hufflepuff.

      • Aeao@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        22 hours ago

        They weren’t particularly sly cunning or smart. Ambitious I’ll give you.

        The book sets it up like slytherin and gryfindor are basically the same except one is evil.

        • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I am quoting the books with cunning and ambitious. It also mentions resourcefulness.

          It’s just that the author is not that good with her craft and she made them Evil, shallow house in practice.

          Or maybe it’s the other way, and she did that on purpose, so that the early children book has visible low stake antagonist Malfoy, who does not really matter compared to BBEG.

          • Aeao@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            I understand what you mean. They are said to be those traits but that is absolutely not portrayed in the book.

            So if you’re reading the books or watching the movie and thinking “I relate to those guys” all there is to relate to is being “bad”

            They don’t have anything else going for them in the story.

            • boonhet@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Yeah the sorting hat sorta tells Harry slitherin folks are destined for big things (not necessarily good, but big) but then there’s dumbfucks like crabbe and goyle in there who couldn’t accomplish shit.

              Joanne Kowling Rowling didn’t exactly stay consistent about things in those books.

      • deus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Dude, the Hufflepuffs’ dorms are described as cozy and are located near the kitchen, that’s objectivelly the best place to sleep in.

        • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I thought about it. But low ceiling and the fact they are described as basically background noise made me uninterested ultimately. :-)

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            The most powerful wizard out of the Triwizard tournament. “Background noise”. If school houses are groups then the “best” of those school houses should say more than the perspective of a boy bias by being in a different group.

            Edit: maybe I shouldnt say most powerful, best rounded? Idk.

      • Aeao@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        She doesn’t have a snape tattoo. She has slytherin and deatheater tattoos.

          • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Idk I think Malfoy gets it rough, kid was basically raised in and surrounded by a cult 24/7 with the threat of being ostracized by his family, friends and basically everyone he’d ever known if he put a foot out of line. The fact that he got any redemption arc at all even if it was late is more than a lot of indoctrinated people manage IRL.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            18 hours ago

            A stalker who worshipped one woman because she talked to him as a child and he decided to abuse orphaned children caused by the very hate group he was a part of. As Voldemort is supposed to be placed during WW2, snape became a NAZI by choice… Then only decided to oppose them when Hitler decided to kill someone he cared about.

            Why he is such an ass to Neville we’ll never understand.

            • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I thought he hated Neville because who the chosen one was prophecy described either Harry or Neville, and Voldemort went after Harry, sealing who the prophecy was and sealing Harry’s mother’s fate, making Snape hate him because Neville’s parents could have died instead of a woman that would have never gotten with his shit ass.

              But it’s been ages since I’ve read the books.

              • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Nevilles parents were tortured to insanity by Snapes friend. “Not his friend” walks into his home and he doesn’t kill them. How do we know it was done before… Because they did it before Voldemort died. He was a baby who was orphaned because Snape was and will always be, worse than 99% of NAZI’s. His actions after proved it

  • trslim@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    The only one i have a gripe with is the Brand of Sacrifice. Yes, in the Berserk world, it marks one for sacrifice by the Godhand. But we dont live in the Berserk world. To me, the Brand is a sign of struggle, and a symbol of resisting fate and destiny. It’s standing up for yourself, even when the easy thing would be to lay down. It’s facing adversity and pain when the world wants to kick you and beat you down. That’s what the Brand means to me.

    But fuck Griffith, i want that twink obliterated.

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      37 minutes ago

      Came here to say this, the brand of sacrifice is symbolic of mankinds eternal struggle to live. I think that message is pretty clear.

    • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      But fuck Griffith, i want that twink obliterated.

      I mean, right before he did the, uh, stuff he kinda was. A whole buncha torture stuff happened to him before he did the things.

      • beejboytyson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Nah, Griffith was always about that shit that’s the point. Griffith was always about himself that was a huge plot point of the story. Given that choice again 10 times out of 10 he would pick it the same choice. He would do anything achieve his goals, he’d probably do worse if he had to.

  • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I don’t understand why it’s bad to enjoy evil characters. I don’t want to just consume Disney forever. I wouldn’t say I like Griffith as a person, but he is a very interesting character and crucial to the plot of Berserk. The title makes it sound like there is some alternative version of Berserk where Griffith doesn’t exist and it’s somehow better. Just because I like these characters doesn’t mean I missed any point. I don’t think that’s the case for most people. These posts are r/iamverysmart material.

    • beejboytyson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You are missing the point, this post proves it. Nobody said that you can’t call characters well written or interesting, where people fall short is when they think these people are anything to aspire to or emulate. If you’re doing neither then move on but if you think those guys are worth anything of human value then you’d be severely confused on what humanity is worth.

      • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I don’t think anyone is really saying any of those things though beyond obvious trolls. At least for most of the characters in this post. Maybe the fight club guy is an exception. Who is with 100% sincerity saying that Griffith and Johan are in the right? This post is making up problems that don’t exist.

    • Vreyan31@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      20 hours ago

      If you understand that Griffith is not someone anyone should want to emulate, I don’t think this meme is about you anyway.

      This meme is about the insecure dudes who are hurt and angry and decide to channel that into some cringe edge-lord ‘I want to hurt everyone else and feel nothing but that it is my destiny to be on top’ phase.

      • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I have a hard time believing that those people represent a demographic larger than just a few online trolls. I think the meme is really about OP feeling smart

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Is this becoming a big thing somewhere? I have somehow managed to avoid those communities apparently. Or is it tied to a certain age group I don’t fall into?

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Becoming? It’s not new. Plenty of people have seen Scarface as a self-made badass instead of the pathetic, neurotic mess of a man he collapses into.

        • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          This is the part I’m stuck on too lol. People see a couple of trolls online and believe there is a whole community of Griffith worshipers

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            I was unaware if it was that’s why I figured it was worth asking. I don’t exactly travel the world and my passport is in fact expired lol. So if it isn’t happening locally in my small town I find I may be blind to it

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I don’t understand why it’s bad to enjoy evil characters.

      Just because I like these characters doesn’t mean I missed any point.

      It’s not bad but it’s a dangerous line to tread. You may get the nuance but far too many people don’t. It’s why so many people are enchanted by Tyler Durden and Patrick Bateman. These characters are meant to be vilified, not aspired to. That is why the cults of personality and admiring strongman authoritarians still persist because many people are easily impressed by raw display of power. Yanis Varoufakis mentioned we are all susceptible to it-- and by extension fascism-- in varying degrees and we’d be lying if we don’t feel impressed. He’s not saying we all secretly admire fascists but that all of us have a dark side and containing it is really the challenge.

      • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I know it’s just my personal experience but I see more people saying that people are enchanted by those characters than i’ve ever seen anyone actually admit to it. Maybe you have, I can’t really argue that. I also disagree that it is a dangerous line to tread. Liking evil characters isn’t anymore dangerous than liking violent video games like GTA

        • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I see more people saying that people are enchanted by those characters than i’ve ever seen anyone actually admit to it.

          I don’t know about you but i see on social media defending and glazing toxic masculine figures such as Tyler Durden and Patrick Bateman. The profile of those admirers are typically lonely and insecure men, which another user has pointed out.

          • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I can agree that there are probably some people who severely misunderstand those two characters. I do find it kinda funny that we both picked completely different people from the post. I firmly believe no one is misunderstanding Griffith and Johan. Any posts you may have seen defending them are 100% trolls

            • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I don’t know about Griffith and Johan. I just thought they are of the same level of asshole-ness as Patrick Bateman, Tyler Durden and Joker because they are put together in this post 😅

              Any posts you may have seen defending them are 100% trolls

              I even met people in real life who hinted they admire toxic male figures although they won’t say it out loud. But in social media, they are vocal what they truly believe in. Although many are trolls, some indeed admire toxic masculinity. Social media merely gave these folks a megaphone to proclaim their thoughts.

              • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                In short, Griffith turns into a God/Demon by sacrificing all of his friends and followers, then proceeds to rape his best friend’s love interest right in front of him. Johan was the product of a Nazi experiment to turn humans into super soldiers from birth.

                In all honestly, I likely wouldn’t have been so critical of this post had they not been included with the likes of Tyler Durdan, Joker, and Bateman. Lots of users have used the latter 3 as examples that work with what the OP is saying. I just don’t believe Griffith and Johan fit here.

                • Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  So the Nazi experiment was eugenics, so natural birth. I totally forgot about the Nazi character. I had to go check what you were talking about.

    • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Agreed. I love tons of evil characters precisely because they are more interesting or they make the world more interesting. So many have more interesting motivations, more interesting developments, and more interesting dialogue than the hero roles they counter.

    • Jiggle_Physics@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      There is a difference between enjoying an evil character, and what a lot of people do with these specific evil characters. The ones in this meme are often looked up to by a bunch of people. There are lots of people who believe they are the correct person in the story, or otherwise the one to be idolized.

      • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I can’t really counter your argument, I’ve just never heard of anyone who thinks Griffith, Johan or any of these characters are correct. I’m not saying they don’t exist, but I doubt it’s anywhere close to being a split position to having.

        • Jiggle_Physics@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Well, TBF, you have to get deeper into the weeb side of the black pill movement to understand how many weirdos out their side with grifith’s philosophy/the godhead, or Johan from monster. However, you will absolutely see them frequently if you, for some reason, subject yourself to places that have black pillers in larger numbers, twitter, 4chan, facebook… You would probably have to been in conversation space about scifi to really see the people who unironically defend the military government of earth in starship troopers, however its pretty common when the subject comes up.

          However the Joker? you really have never seen people side with the Joker? I actually have a hard time believing you are social media savvy enough to be on Lemmy, and have not experienced the armies of losers that identify with the Joker as a hero. This is like police with punisher skulls level of common. The idolization of Tyler Durden as a working class hero is also quite common.

          • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            You’re right about Tyler Durdan and Joker. By “these characters” I was referring to the ones I mentioned specifically, Griffith and Johan. Bad choice of words on my part.