More dataisdepressing than dataisbeautiful

  • LowleeKun@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 minutes ago

    Ohh wait, this is actually good for my dating chances. Gotta find the good in the bad…

  • LordGimp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Why does everything appear to appear at +15 across the board just before 1990?

  • Communist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Weird that men used to be more liberal at any point.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    So probably -

    When you’re accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression

    Men want the days back when they were more in charge and didn’t have to worry about consequences so much.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yes. Liberal is the opposite of “moralist” and sometimes “oppressive”.

      The US use of the word “liberal” is a bit shifted in the direction of “libertine” (same as libertarian, but strongly focused on personal freedoms of substance abuse and sexual promiscuity at the expense of economical\political freedoms to own catgirl slaves and shoot up crowds).

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          In what way? Conservativism is a branch of Liberalism, just like Progressivism. They are all under the Capitalist umbrella of Liberalism. The opposite, therefore, is Socialism.

          • portuga@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Not sure I fully agree with your take, but that’s beside the point. They said “wrong”, now that settles it. Sorry, maybe next argument 🤷‍♂️

          • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Congratulations, you have successfully redefined imprtant words in a way that makes your understanding of them fundamentally incomoatible with other people’s, rendering clear communication impossible.

            I don’t know why this was your goal, but I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming it was intentional, because the only alternative is that you are less intelligent than a particularly dense house plant.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Never redefined any of it. Liberalism is the ideology supporting Capitalism, Progressivism is the left side of liberalism and conservativism is the right side. Progressives still support Capitalism, same with conservatives.

              • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 hours ago

                I mean it isn’t. Progressivism only seems to exist as a word in America, because the USA has the red scares, and conflates communism and socialism, and so are scared of the phrase and had to reinvent their own.

                In Europe, you have Conservatives (right wing market, socially conservative), Liberals (free market, but with positivity towards social reforms). Socialism or Democratic Socialism (positive social reforms, state involvement, but with democracy). Communism (economic distribution but more autocratic), and Social Democratic (somewhere between Liberal and Democratic Socialist). Socialism is where you’re willing to consider the state getting involved in wealth redistribution.

                It’s better you understand political philosophy and how it is used and applies around the world to truly understand it. You cannot understand the spectrum, if you cannot zoom out from the Overton window.

              • Shark_Ra_Thanos@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                Listen, I too can write several paragraphs painting the consequences of redefining the relevant key words in hand. I will be careful to avoid providing substance of the topic in hand while attempting to make you feel guilty and of poor character.

                Do not misunderstand anything I say because I will try to make sure you think that your work actually harms people because your education and intelligence are insufficient and even subversive. If you do not, you will see that everyone else will be buying a nice lollipop for the event and add to the consequential sugar.

                This explains why they are fat and sitting at a computer in their parent’s basement. You won’t be able stop it because no matter what you do, there are so many that the truth is inevitable for everyone involved; whether they bother to acknowledge such or not.

  • ntm@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 hours ago

    How does it start with women being more conservative than men in Germany and the US?

  • Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    That’s why there are so many incels conservatives and more lesbians, the numbers talks from themselves.

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    The important thing here is to know how did they measure young people’s political ideologies. I wouldn’t expect it was self-perceived as currently, people have a hard time admitting they are conservative compared to admitting they sympathize with a conservative party.

    If it was determined by a questionnaire, it would be interesting to see what questions were included. Maybe the questions weren’t well planned and that’s it. Maybe they equalled feminist takes to progressive liberal ones, which is something that can be discussed. In this case, I would be picky about the origin of the graphics.

  • Don_alForno@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    The gap sounds plausible, but I highly doubt the overall positions relative to 0.

    E.g., the Federal Republic of Germany has had conservative chancellors for 51 years out of the 75 since it was founded. We did not have a constant left majority (I assume that is what they mean by liberal, since the actual sense of the term doesn’t make sense as an opposite to “conservative”).

    • 5C5C5C@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      14 hours ago

      These graphs only cover the demographic of 18-29 year olds, which historically do lean heavily towards progressive.

    • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      This is only a relative argument if you can prove the government accurately and granularly represents the population. That would be nice if it were true but speaking as an American, I find it hard to believe.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    It’s weird that the axes of where “centre” is remain stable over time. Can you imagine comparing “left vs right” between the 1890s and the 1920s? Like a bunch of stuff happened in between, history happened, and that tends to redefine left, right and centre.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Also hard to believe the American average is +20 leaning lib. The country is represented by a fascist party and a centrist party, and anything more left than the centrist party is considered “far left”.

      • zarenki@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The Y axis here is not an absolute international political compass. It measures which political party each person favors, and judging by that country’s local standards categorizes that party as either left or right.

        A rising number in the US chart means a larger number of people prefer democrats over republicans. It doesn’t mean that people’s stances are necessarily moving further left. Similarly, it’s no coincidence that the inflection point where UK numbers rise by a lot correspond to Brexit: the party seen as responsible for the unpopular change lost a lot of support, but that doesn’t mean the population has so sharply moved drastically more progressive in such a short time.

      • greedytacothief@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The graph is about young people, not the entire population. Young people in America are historically more progressive than older people.

        Also why does liberal and conservative have to be on an absolute scale? The words liberal and conservative seem to me at least be about pushing politics in one direction or another. Because policy is always subject to change, shouldn’t the words liberal and conservative be relative to the political system they exist within?

        • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Yes, “liberal” and “conservative” are relative, not absolute terms. There’s a concept known as the Overton Window which describes exactly this shift of what is considered the “center” and what is considered a radical left/right position in any given society at any given time.

          The idea that people should vote for their representatives, for example, was once considered an extremist take that could ruin civilization itself if implemented. The Overton Window shifted and nowadays even most Fascists will at least pretend in public to agree with it.

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          And, I did miss that important detail.

          It doesn’t have to be an absolute scale of course, but then why show 4 countries where all seem to deviate from the center? Are these country graphs even comparable?

          • greedytacothief@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Yeah I agree, it’s not a very good graph. I just get frustrated when people ridicule the US political system for everything. We have a lot to fix (like what’s causing women to become more liberal), but I think we need to focus on what’s actionable and reasonable to fix. We can’t become +20 more liberal overnight.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Sauce, for those interested - https://www.ft.com/content/29fd9b5c-2f35-41bf-9d4c-994db4e12998

    In the US, Gallup data shows that after decades where the sexes were each spread roughly equally across liberal and conservative world views, women aged 18 to 30 are now 30 percentage points more liberal than their male contemporaries. That gap took just six years to open up.

    So it might be worth taking it with a pinch of salt because I’m betting it’s using the very dumbed down “liberal vs conservative” 'murican political view. Maybe skew all results down 3-6 points.

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Anyone wanna take bets that the datatrend will change once we have fully functional Gynoids?

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      We won’t. The desire is to be connected to a real living woman. Toys can’t get sophisticated enough to make you believe what you prematurely know to not be true.

      • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yeah that’s what meant by fully “functional”. We already see it with people purchasing sex dolls and even the AI powered ones that have conversations. If a AI dolls is indistinguishable or at least good enough from a human female I bet we will see a change as the populous is satisfied.