Strange how this talk of “collateral” damage only applies to when Israelis kill civilians and not when, say, Hamas or Hezbollah do it.

Using your own despicable and dehumanizing approach, October the 7th merely had 797 “collateral victims” for the 379 legitimate Israeli security forces targets. And after all, the 2:1 civilian to military casualties ratio is basically the same as the IDF’s own record in Gaza.

Ah what to do, such is war…

No.

Fuck that barbaric way of devaluing the loss of human life.

Source: IDF said trust me bro.

Netanyahu desperately needs a regional war. How many people must die so that this bag of shit doesn’t face an Israeli judge for his scandals?

If the third parties abide by Brazilian law, they should have legal representation in the country and therefore can be pursued for circumventing the law?

And your evidence that Israel only targetted active duty Hezbollah combattants?

What a load of ghoulish warmongering. Oh it’s war? If Hezbollah had done this to Israelis, the world would be crying blood and vowing for Israel’s right to defend itself.

Jew media

Fuck off.

So like killing a “handful” of Israeli civilians would be “exceptionally good” if the target was a bunch of IDF reservists?

So, like, are Israeli reservists fair game for terror attacks?

Hm, sure taxes went up in that sense, but ultimately they funded some good social programs, such as universal daycare, expanded dental care etc. Plus the whole CERB thing during the pandemic. So, you know, the overall bottom line is not as clear cut. Unless we’re talking about your particular account.

I don’t know is any political party talking about bringing back the spousal split? All I’ve heard from Bitcoin Trump-lite is the “axe the tax” nonsense about the carbon tax.

None of them electoral politicians, like the ones we’re talking about here. Try again.

I’ve heard that the young’uns call “ohio” things that are weird and cringey.

Name specific policies. Otherwise, I dunno man, maybe you quit a good job or something.

I thought originally that you were suggesting a simple syntactic manipulation of the fraction but you’re not. I don’t understand why the equation you propose is reasonable.

The amount “civilians” in your calculations is tricky. The first time it appears it refers to dead civilians, the second time it appears to the overall civilian population (hence the 1/2 using the rule of thumb that half of Gazans are under 18).

I.e you can’t say

#deadKids/#allDead = #deadCivilians/#allDead * #deadKids/#allCivilians

Because #deadCivilians << #allCivilians

What did Harper do to make your bank account happy? Please refer to specific policies.

Like @filister@lemmy.world said above, it’s 2:1 adults to children, not combatants to non-combattants.

Something something they voted 20 years ago. /s

It’s actually genocidal language…

Unclear. Are you referring to human rights abuses in cobalt mining? Are you talking specifically or abstractly? About a specific industry or generally? Individually or at the national level?

Nobody is talking about billionaires “giving up their stuff” or making a “sacrifice”. This is about wresting ownership of the means of production away from the capitalists. I don’t know exactly what you mean by “complicity” in this particular discussion, you’ll have to clarify.