Honestly, I’d like to think there’s a middle ground where we place golf courses in more ethically sound locations. Right now, a lot of courses are just gigantic resource sinks sitting on real-estate that could be put to better use.
Better to place then on land reclaimed from strip mining, cemeteries, or other low-productivity locations.
There’s at least one course in my area that uses the income to help the surrounding nature. Plus they have strict rules regarding what areas you’re allowed to go during bird breeding seasons
Arguably the worst part would be the large area of grass. But even that is mostly offset by them maintaining the somewhat “wild” spots between the courses and the area being grassy to begin with
They are also quite affordable, so it’s not a snobby rich club. So it’s basically a nice way for people to enjoy nature and walk around more
I’ve never understood why golf couldn’t have different terrain (in the way that tennis does). Wouldn’t it make golf more interesting if you had to play on a clay course? I feel like this would make sense in places like Arizona. Adapt the sport to the environment.
While I agree wholeheartedly, it has one fundamental problem: dirt. If there’s one thing that golf courses aren’t, it’s dirty. The sport has a lot of class and image tied up in it, and I highly doubt that you’ll get many of those folks out into the clay like that. You’d be creating a whole new extreme form of golf, instead.
Good, if a bunch of prissy pissant profligates get fucked over all the better. If ya want to play golf go somewhere where the environment can actually support the original course type, if I want to camp in the woods I don’t try to terra form the local regional park into a forest I go to the mountains where there are more than 2 trees per square yard.
Honestly, I’d like to think there’s a middle ground where we place golf courses in more ethically sound locations. Right now, a lot of courses are just gigantic resource sinks sitting on real-estate that could be put to better use.
Better to place then on land reclaimed from strip mining, cemeteries, or other low-productivity locations.
There’s at least one course in my area that uses the income to help the surrounding nature. Plus they have strict rules regarding what areas you’re allowed to go during bird breeding seasons
Arguably the worst part would be the large area of grass. But even that is mostly offset by them maintaining the somewhat “wild” spots between the courses and the area being grassy to begin with
They are also quite affordable, so it’s not a snobby rich club. So it’s basically a nice way for people to enjoy nature and walk around more
It’s possible. Sadly the minority
I’ve never understood why golf couldn’t have different terrain (in the way that tennis does). Wouldn’t it make golf more interesting if you had to play on a clay course? I feel like this would make sense in places like Arizona. Adapt the sport to the environment.
While I agree wholeheartedly, it has one fundamental problem: dirt. If there’s one thing that golf courses aren’t, it’s dirty. The sport has a lot of class and image tied up in it, and I highly doubt that you’ll get many of those folks out into the clay like that. You’d be creating a whole new extreme form of golf, instead.
Good, if a bunch of prissy pissant profligates get fucked over all the better. If ya want to play golf go somewhere where the environment can actually support the original course type, if I want to camp in the woods I don’t try to terra form the local regional park into a forest I go to the mountains where there are more than 2 trees per square yard.
You’re describing putt-putt golf.