I’m not suspicious of yours if it makes you feel better. I don’t think you’re an antisemite, just someone who picks up their dog whistles unintentionally. That doesn’t make it helpful, especially in countering a genocidal colonial settler state. Fascists always prefer that their opponents are shitty like they are, which is why they play both sides with supporting Israel and antisemitic conspiracies.

“you though!”

The whole joke was that it was not Mr. Beast :c

Wadaya mean!? That’s totally the Beastarino, the big Mr., the billionaire “philanthropist.” Who else would it be?

Too bad that ideology drove wealth inequality which empowered populism which empowered fascism which destroyed the interconnected economy. Neoliberalism was never a solution to peace.

I don’t like “philanthropy” that positions benevolent billionaires as a solution to people’s problems. It’s Gospel of Wealth shit and it just gives cover to the most evil people in society. People supporting each other with what they can give is good, but billionaires like Beast never give what they can. For him especially it was just a business expense, not a charitable donation.

owned by Israel and the Rothschild’s

Owned by RACIST WHITE CAPITALISTS who see Israel’s ethnostate as preferable to brown Muslims having power. They want a pseudo European foothold with the same genocidal cleansing strategy as America’s genocide of Native Americans. They even got Protestant cultists to believe that the Jews retaking Israel is some prophecy.

The best part is that they’re raising a generation of antisemites to support their future fascist plans, and you’re a part of it. Singling out the Rothschild’s and Israel as opposed to any other rich dynasty is a long held antisemitic dog whistle. It’s one step removed from blaming a globalist cabal (((Jews))), and it works because global capitalism is a real problem and Israel is a genocidal ethnostate.

However, antisemitism is the tool of the Epstein class, and it will be used to keep us locked in a cycle of fascism for generations. They will use this divide and conquer strategy until we reject their bootleg socialism and wise the fuck up. Be. Fucking. Smarter.

Honestly, if Trump gets around to it, he will try to invade and annex Canada. Hell, even if he doesn’t do it, him normalizing the idea makes it a greater possibility down the road if anyone similar rises again. Do not underestimate Trump’s willingness to do stupid shit just because he wants to feel powerful.

Dang, it’s almost like this war has a ton of collateral damage for anyone nearby. Shame the US launched an unprovoked and unjustifiable attack that will only worsen the situation for everyone.

based

At least Markiplier seems chill despite his success

mf is a straight thirst trap

Nah, even people with the right ideas on politics can have these blind spots. Nobody is immune and when everyone is vulnerable to something, those blind spots add up. It’s what allows divide and conquer strategies to expand beyond those who are more conservative.

And if that’s what we’re talking about, mastiffs, great danes, and any other big dog should get more attention than they do. The conversation should be refocused from scapegoating specific breeds to handling large and strong dogs. Focusing on breeds derails the conversation every time by inviting in old school eugenics and all the problems that come with it.

That’s hardly debated

Individuals having genetic predispositions isn’t debated, but it being tied to breed is. It’s especially less likely for breeds to play a role if they’re more widespread; were the dog’s parents and grandparents bred for dogfights, or just by people who wanted one? There are also no guarantees in genetics, with even genetically identical animals being capable of great variation. Using constructed and arbitrary categories like breed to tie behavior to looks is silly.

You’d need to compare it to the number of each type of dog in those statistics. Even then, it wouldn’t tell the whole story because people who buy dogs with bad reputations often buy them for roles where they are more likely to bite like guard dogs. And EVEN then, you also need to consider that dogs who cause worse injuries are more likely to show up in the data because when they do bite it gets reported. I know I didn’t go to the hospital when a Chihuahua didn’t even break skin.

Pit bulls undeniably are dangerous by virtue of their size and strength, but so are other dogs. How inherently dangerous they are based on temperament is harder to determine. I’m always skeptical of breed essentialism because it’s so close to human eugenics and scientific racism. We do not have as much control or understanding over nature as we think we do, and our misplaced confidence in our abilities causes harm and keeps us from actual solutions.

You’re not wrong; you can absolutely roleplay toxic dynamics and still have a wonderful relationship. However, these characters are not only terrible for each other, but comically terrible people.

I’m telling you, I’ve seen otherwise brilliant people say the dumbest shit. The world is hard to understand in the first place and it’s often too scary to face the facts.