I just want to make funny Pictures.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    The fact that you can’t pin down most AI photos to a combination of existing art is proof that’s untrue. A random number generator can create unique numbers just like a human asked to write a list of random numbers.

    A random AI photo generator will create a unique work of art. Your claim was that it is a copyright violation to copy an art style.

    That a human can add meaning, and emotion to art is a question of quality. I never questioned that human art is higher quality.

    • turtletracks@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      I wish you understood how AI worked lol. People who don’t know how an AI works on a technical scale should not have opinions on whether or not it’s copywritten

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        You don’t know how it works at a technical level. Neural net training on data isn’t copying images into a database for retrieval like you imagine.

        35 years ago I was messing around with neural net models for optical character recognition. What have you done?

    • turtletracks@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      And a random number generator is not random lol. And I never claimed copying an art style is a copyright violation, stop putting words in my mouth. God you people are so fucking annoying to argue with, making shit up, ignoring any points, you don’t even understand how the thing works

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Humans can’t generate random numbers either. For example people won’t repeat digits if asked to give a random sample despite that being possible.