It’s my belief that it is a human conceit that emotions are the pinnacle of defining humanity.
Emotions are in reality a simplified thought process. It’s why animals are capable of emotions. It’s an evolutionary survival mechanism that’s simpler and faster than rational thought.
That’s why it’s easy for an LLM to simulate emotions but can’t see why you need to drive 50m to the car wash.
You sandwiched your admission that the photo showed blue tarnish on silver between a claim that the photo didn’t show blue and the false claim that the OP specifically asked why blue in particular.
Your post started with “pictures of tungsten aren’t helpful”. This is proof you didn’t read the Wikipedia article where it shows a silver coin with tarnish.
The OP didn’t say blue. They said colorful. You brought up blue to deflect from you not reading the article that showed colorful silver tarnish.
Re: flow through
A mesh like container so all sides are exposed to air. Many 3d printed designs have channels so air can get into the middle of the desiccant container.
Is that the special relationship with the US I hear about?
For the downvoter, I’m referring to the measles outbreak in the US which has now spread and contaminated the UK.
I suspect that’s what he already has. I can’t imagine a compressor based dehumidifier that’s so tiny.
Are you sure it’s 35% ? I’ve found those cheap digital hygrometers to be off by 10-15%.
I bought a box and some say 10 and some say 20. I ended up buying several different brands and price ranges of hygrometers to try and figure out which ones were correct.
I use cereal boxes with desiccant and without any active dehumidifier they stay at ~25% despite being frequently opened and closed. So like others suggested, put a large flow-through bin of desiccant in and forget about it.
Also is that a compressor dehumidifier? I suspect it’s a desiccant wheel because it’s so tiny.
Could you point me to more info about that?
That is a surprisingly not blue tarnish this photo provides no evidence
A woman’s right to birth control isn’t forcing anyone.
There are many things that are necessary but that doesn’t mean forcing people.
So when I say that a declining population isn’t a disaster I’m promoting genocide, but when you take the opposite position it’s not forced birth for women?
Stop being a hypocrite. I didn’t claim genocide just like you didn’t claim rape.
Right below the picture of tungsten is this picture of a silver dollar.
Holy misconstrued reading, Batman!
How about I flip your argument like you did to me:
Are you proposing forced rape to impregnate women? That’s what “population decline disaster” people end up wanting.
None! I didn’t even hint at a forced population reduction.
In the developed world, fewer people are having children and those that do are having smaller families. That means instead of a worker supporting both his parents and children they only need to support their parents. When the parent dies there is now more land and resources so things like real estate gets cheaper. Fewer workers means each worker is more valuable and can demand more pay from the ownership class.
I have no fucking idea how stating this gets construed into meaning genocide.
(supporting doesn’t necessarily mean direct support but through their job that helps everyone in society and taxes that go to schools and healthcare.)
I don’t understand how it works? I saw a video where he took a bite of a banana before the forecast. How does that stop anyone from cutting and pasting one second of him biting the banana into the start of an ai video with a statement “banana” .
I ran into this while installing Docker under Linux.
They call it Gordon.
I didn’t even imply a plague should happen. Parents having fewer children isn’t a war.
The only people who are hurt by a population decline is the 1% whose income isn’t from working but from how many people they have working for them.
As another replier said, they use an HP cartridge. So this open printer will be ewaste in 5 years
the ratio between pensioners and productive workers will be a lot worse.
That is a false idea not supported by theory or history. It costs more to raise a child than care for elderly. When the child is grown it consumes more resources unlike the elderly who free up resources upon death.
The historical periods following large population declines were always the most prosperous. For example the Black Pague and more recently WW2.
I don’t understand any of the references in this comic. It’s SpongeBob, Hank and Bobby but other than that I’m lost.
Why are SpongeBob and Hank at a convention? What’s that Stargate looking device behind Bobby?