• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species.

    They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image.

    Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.

    • BluesF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Still wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.