I’m writing a program that wraps around dd to try and warn you if you are doing anything stupid. I have thus been giving the man page a good read. While doing this, I noticed that dd supported all the way up to Quettabytes, a unit orders of magnitude larger than all the data on the entire internet.

This has caused me to wonder what the largest storage operation you guys have done. I’ve taken a couple images of hard drives that were a single terabyte large, but I was wondering if the sysadmins among you have had to do something with e.g a giant RAID 10 array.

  • Davel23@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not that big by today’s standards, but I once downloaded the Windows 98 beta CD from a friend over dialup, 33.6k at best. Took about a week as I recall.

  • Urist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I obviously downloaded a car after seeing that obnoxious anti-piracy ad.

  • freijon@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m currently backing up my /dev folder to my unlimited cloud storage. The backup of the file /dev/random is running since two weeks.

    • Mike1576218@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      No wonder. That file is super slow to transfer for some reason. but wait till you get to /dev/urandom. That file hat TBs to transfer at whatever pipe you can throw at it…

      • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        /dev/random and other “files” in /dev are not really files, they are interfaces which van be used to interact with virtual or hardware devices. /dev/random spits out cryptographically secure random data. Another example is /dev/zero, which spits out only zero bytes.

        Both are infinite.

        Not all “files” in /dev are infinite, for example hard drives can (depending on which technology they use) be accessed under /dev/sda /dev/sdb and so on.

  • Neuromancer49@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    In grad school I worked with MRI data (hence the username). I had to upload ~500GB to our supercomputing cluster. Somewhere around 100,000 MRI images, and wrote 20 or so different machine learning algorithms to process them. All said and done, I ended up with about 2.5TB on the supercomputer. About 500MB ended up being useful and made it into my thesis.

    Don’t stay in school, kids.

  • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 months ago

    Entire drive/array backups will probably be by far the largest file transfer anyone ever does. The biggest I’ve done was a measly 20TB over the internet which took forever.

    Outside of that the largest “file” I’ve copied was just over 1TB which was a SQL file backup for our main databases at work.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        A small dcp is around 500gb. But that’s like basic film shizz, 2d, 5.1 audio. For comparison, the 3D deadpool 2 teaser was 10gb.

        Aspera’s commonly used for transmission due to the way it multiplexes. It’s the same protocolling behind Netflix and other streamers, although we don’t have to worry about preloading chunks.

        My laughter is mostly because we’re transmitting to a couple thousand clients at once, so even with a small dcp thats around a PB dropped without blinking

        • MoonMelon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          In the early 2000s I worked on an animated film. The studio was in the southern part of Orange County CA, and the final color grading / print (still not totally digital then) was done in LA. It was faster to courier a box of hard drives than to transfer electronically. We had to do it a bunch of times because of various notes/changes/fuck ups. Then the results got courier’d back because the director couldn’t be bothered to travel for the fucking million dollars he was making.

        • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I used to work in the same industry. We transferred several PBs from West US to Australia using Aspera via thick AWS pipes. Awesome software.

          • Taleya@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Hahahah did you enjoy Australian Internet? It’s wonderfully archaic

            (MPS, Delux, Gofilex or Qubewire?)

        • potajito@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ahhh thanks for the reply! Makes sense! We also use Aspera here at work (videogames) but dont move that ammount, not even close.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve done a 1PB sync between a pair of 8-node SAN clusters as one was being physically moved since it’d be faster to seed the data and start a delta sync rather than try to do it all over a 10Gb pipe. M

  • Hugin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 months ago

    It was something around 40 TB X2 . We were doing a terrain analysis of the entire Earth. Every morning for 25 days I would install two fresh drives in the cluster doing the data crunching and migrate the filled drives to our file server rack.

    The drives were about 80% full and our primary server was mirrored to two other 50 drive servers. At the end of the month the two servers were then shipped to customer locations.

  • Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    I once abused an SMTP relay (my own) by emailing Novell a 400+ MB memory dump. Their FTP site kept timing out.

    After all that, and them swearing they had to have it, the OS team said “Nope, we’re not going to look at it”. Guess how I feel about Novell after that?

    This was in the mid-90’s.

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    In the middle of something 200tb for my Plex server going from a 12 bay system to a 36 LFF system. But I’ve also literally driven servers across the desert because it was faster than trying to move data from one datacenter to another.

  • d00phy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve migrated petabytes from one GPFS file system to another. More than once, in fact. I’ve also migrated about 600TB of data from D3 tape format to 9940.

  • neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I don’t remember how many files, but typically these geophysical recordings clock in at 10-30 GB. What I do remember, though, was the total transfer size: 4TB. It was kind of like a bunch of .segd, and they were stored in this server cluster that was mounted in a shipping container for easy transport and lifting onboard survey ships. Some geophysics processors needed it on the other side of the world. There were nobody physically heading in the same direction as the transfer, so we figured it would just be easier to rsync it over 4G. It took a little over a week to transfer.

    Normally when we have transfers of a substantial size going far, we ship it on LTO. For short distance transfers we usually run a fiber, and I have no idea how big the largest transfer job has been that way. Must be in the hundreds of TB. The entire cluster is 1.2PB, bit I can’t recall ever having to transfer everything in one go, as the receiving end usually has a lot less space.

  • Decency8401@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    A few years back I worked at a home. They organised the whole data structure but needed to move to another Providor. I and my colleagues moved roughly just about 15.4 TB. I don’t know how long it took because honestly we didn’t have much to do when the data was moving so we just used the downtime for some nerd time. Nerd time in the sense that we just started gaming and doing a mini LAN party with our Raspberry and banana pi’s.

    Surprisingly the data contained information of lots of long dead people which is quiet scary because it wasn’t being deleted.

    • 🐍🩶🐢@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      No idea about which specific type of business it is, but keeping that history long term can have some benefits, especially to outside people. Some government agencies require companies to keep records for a certain number of years. It could also help out in legal investigations many years in the future and show any auditors you keep good records. From a historical perspective, it can be matched to census, birth, and death certificates. A lot of generational history gets lost.

      Companies also just hoard data. Never know what will be useful later. shrug