Chinese police hunting international corruption targets were allowed into Australia by the federal police and subsequently escorted a woman back to China for trial, in a major breach of Chinese-Australian police protocols.

The revelations, contained in Monday night’s Four Corners program about a former Chinese spy, prompted a sharp rebuke from federal politicians who are concerned the act may have undermined Australia’s national security.

The Chinese police were permitted to enter Australia in 2019 to talk with a 59-year-old Chinese-born Australian resident.

The woman was targeted under a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) anti-corruption drive called Operation Fox Hunt, which relies on police from the Ministry of Public Security (MPS) to make arrests.

Her case is one of 283 cases documented by an international NGO, Safeguard Defenders, in its recent report, Chasing Fox Hunt.

While Fox Hunt is described by the CCP as targeting “economic criminals”, human rights groups have said it is also used to silence dissidents and abduct people around the world.

  • @Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2151 month ago

    Can’t speak for Australians, but as a Canadian who expects that the same could happen here - why the fuck are our governments so apathetic about this shit?.

    Stand up for the people trusting you. Be MAD. Stop doing it if you’re also doing it.

    • @kungen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1441 month ago

      Even the article is apathetic… they write “escorted” her back to China, when it’d actually be “kidnapped” or “abducted”…?

    • @Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      641 month ago

      In the UK there was a peaceful protester and the Chinese dragged him into the embassy grounds and beat him in front of the public. They have diplomatic immunity.

      Nothing was done obviously.

      No wonder China and Russia shit over us and act like we are weak. We are. We proved it multiple times.

      Fuck the West is shadow of what it once was.

          • @jalkasieni@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            161 month ago

            The name originally comes from Finland and the Winter War, where they were used against soviet tanks.

              • @catloaf@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                121 month ago

                Why don’t you quote that whole paragraph:

                The name’s origin came from the propaganda Molotov produced during the Winter War, mainly his declaration on Soviet state radio that incendiary bombing missions over Finland were actually “airborne humanitarian food deliveries” for their “starving” neighbours.[13][10][better source needed] As a result, the Finns sarcastically dubbed the Soviet incendiary cluster bombs “Molotov bread baskets” (Finnish: Molotovin leipäkori) in reference to Molotov’s propaganda broadcasts.[14][10] When the hand-held bottle firebomb was developed to attack and destroy Soviet tanks, the Finns called it the “Molotov cocktail”, as “a drink to go with his food parcels”.[15][16]

      • @WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        Yeah, it’s not like western governments, “intelligence” agencies or police would ever beat protesters, persecute political dissidents, murder civilians, torture suspects in designated black sites, ally with dictatorships who torture and murder journalists with bone saws, overthrow democratically elected governments, or engage in any behavior that is horrifically anti-democratic or anti-human rights.

        That time when the west was historically great was a lie. We were only better than fascism or communism, but our ruling class, the politicians they own, and their corporations have always engaged in horrific shit. Ours just hide behind the media and a liability shield of a dozen LLC’s, or do it hidden behind closed doors — unless you’re a palestinian, protester, communist, or a dozen other groups who are okay to oppress publicly at any given time.

          • @WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 month ago

            It would be Whataboutism if I defended the accusations against China or Russia. I explicitly said we were better — just only better than the bottom of the barrel — and the whole point of my comment was to refute the right-wing nationalist fantasy that we were historically “strong”, “great” or “righteous”; a time that never existed in reality.

            I suggest you learn what maketh a logical fallacy.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -71 month ago

        the Chinese dragged him into the embassy grounds and beat him in front of the public

        Uh… any link on that? I’m not finding this reference anywhere.

    • @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      Devil’s Advocacy:

      The why is really really simple. The actions taken in result have the potential to cause more harm than help. Tariffs don’t work, censureship is useless, and war is… yeah. They can get up on stage and shout about how angry they are but it means fuck all. The important part is how WE deal with it. Legislature starts from the grass roots level, political activism and engagement can help make new laws that expressly do not allow extradition by the CCP and other adversarial nations, or in any way allow an arm of the CCP to search for or request information on any individuals.