Am… am I from New York? That’s exactly what I would do in that situation.
Am… am I from New York? That’s exactly what I would do in that situation.
Interesting take. I really enjoy when artists can reflect on their work decades later.
The mechanical iris was a later addition, before that there was a stone cover. Without either anyone can come through from the other side.
The mechanical iris was a later addition, before that there was a stone cover. Without either anyone can come through from the other side.
A little irresponsible leaving it unguarded with the iris open.
it’s much harder to prove because the official acts part also includes all the evidence and testimony needed to prosecute.
So if you can’t use evidence from official communication to prove that the treason happened. That makes the prosecution of presidents very difficult. It’s going to be extremely difficult for a prosecution to tell a coherent story to a jury without including any “official” acts as part of the crime.
Typically there’s a documented hang fire wait time before starting any recovery process.
Though the official process and the actual process is probably pretty different, especially after multiple hang fires.
Eventually they probably just see the dud, flip over the mortar to dump out the dud, throw it as far as possible, then try the next one.
I read this wrong as “Gilbert Gottfried never got to play a Ferengi Therapist” and now I’m double sad.
Unless some numbers are opposite of a gap, then it could never land with that number facing up.
Each side needs an opposing flat part, and I don’t think that can happen with a die with an odd number of sides.
Oh, he claimed it was still stolen in 2016. He says that he won by so much more, but the Democrats stole enough votes to make it look close.
To be fair, what if the entire skeleton drastically changes once you die? You can’t prove it’s NOT the case without an MRI.
Tho… What if an MRI causes the same changes as death…
D) Move manufacturing and other dirty processes off planet and live here.
You’re putting words in my mouth and exaggerating my statements. Just look at how the NASA manned space programs have run since the start, AND how they are currently run. Congress puts a lot of stipulations on how they are manufactured. NASA has a big problem with congressional interference.
Their science/unmanned programs are different, because congress is more hands off. Those are running just fine. The problem is that SpaceX is a huge cost and has a lot of manufacturing and jobs associated with it. That invites congressional interference.
Not only that, but they also have a large commercial presence already with the Starlink. The government doesn’t typically run things like that, so they’ll probably sell of the Starlink portion of the company.
It’s not a conspiracy, it’s not libertarian-ism, it’s just how NASA is run. Once the budgets get into the billions, congress can’t keep their hands off it.
Yes, there are certainly problems with the Commercial Crew program right now, just look at how Starliner is run. We probably won’t get a capsule from Boeing, because they don’t have an incentive to finish, due to the fact that it’s not a cost+ program like the SLS is. SLS is also constrained by politics, they are required to use so many Shuttle parts, just to keep those sub-contractors happy.
It could, but that’s not how these types of programs get run. They’re as much about making jobs in specific areas as they are about solving a problem.
Problem is that if SpaceX becomes part of NASA, then it’ll be like the space shuttle. It’ll need parts made by every small company that contributed to some random representative in every state, so we’ll end up with 300+ contractors all building critical components.
Hot tip, change HIS last name prior to the wedding and she gets the name change free.
I know a couple that waited until after the wedding to do that and the husband changed his name, then the wife was given the option of keeping her old name, or switch to his old name.
She ended up having to go through the entire name change process without the benefit of the auto-name flip from the marriage.
Let me translate that statement: practical sets dramatically enhanced by CGI, with some, maybe all scenes having majority CGI.
NOTHING is pure practical, and it never was. It’s always enhanced by in camera, or post processing. If it wasn’t, it would look awful.
That’s half the plot of Armageddon (1998)