When you can’t get what you want, you teach yourself to want what you can get and then preach to everyone else that they should want it too. This applies to many other things too beyond just cars.
It’s not that the criticism of private cars isn’t valid, but not having one because you can’t afford it isn’t virtuous. It’s only virtuous when you could easily have one but choose not to.
What exactly are you criticising? Cars, or jealous people?
Because I think everyone wants transport / freedom to move wherever they want no, so isn’t cost just a valid argument against car dependency? Because they are expensive
Just your standard issue Republican shit take.
“You don’t like being exploited by the oligarchy? It’s just because you’re jealous, you filthy pauper!”
The people most strongly opposing cars aren’t usually talking about the cost but it gets turned into moral criticism: you’re a bad person for driving a car and basically a sub-human if it’s the wrong kind of one.
I’ve found that the people most strongly opposing cars are the ones that are forced to use them due to insufficient public transport and cycling infrastructure.
And the ones unable to use cars but have to navigate a city that prioritizes cars
never heard that spin before. the cost usually doesn’t come into it because it’s easier to point at how it affects infrastructure, housing, social spaces and convenience.
i really wish i didn’t need a car, but the train only leaves every two hours.
Removed by mod