• reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Casually forgetting that they didn’t shower back then.

    This is a man vs bear scenario, repainted to make the modern man look like what feminazis view us as. Simple as.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Rich guys wearing really dour clothes is actually a relatively recent phenomenon in history. Up to the French Revolution the aristocrats were peacocked up to the max; maybe it was fear of the guillotine that saw their successors going around in North Face jackets.

    • lb_o@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It is still happening, just more metaphorically, so less people can catch it.

  • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Rich cunts then:

    Rich cunts now:

    Poor cunts then:

    Poor cunts now:

    Or to put it another way, nothing has changed. The upper classes still dress like wankers who sniff their own farts, and the lower classes still dress with whatever they can afford that works for them.

  • AmericanEconomicThinkTank@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    See good buddy that’s why you buy yourself thrift.

    I wear suits that cost me 20 bucks that look better than what the president wears. Not that that’s a high bar, but a worthy comparison.

    • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      that’s a part of it, however during the Victorian time. it became fashionable for men to be stoic and boring. that’s why a guy can wear the same outfit for a meeting, a wedding, and a funeral.

      although wealth is a big factor. it isn’t the whole story. a good suit can cost a lot and still be fashionably bankrupt.

      And if you try to put some flare, they will question your sexuality and distupt the corporate dynamics.

        • eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Look up “Beau Brummely” and “Great Renunciation”.

          US southern-prep khakis, blazer, shirt and tie, slightly longer hair is pretty much the exact look Brummely and his dandies created and socially enforced through mockery.

          Some people claim that the underlying force granting Brummely the ability to do so had to do with the center of power shifting from traditional nobility to financiers.

      • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        i also want to bring back balding friendly hair styles, which were popular across many cultures in the past, so much so that it was common for people to shave their heads to achieve it. look at traditional Japanese hair cuts, or European monks.

        on paper they’ll say there’s a reason for that. but I’m being the style came first, then they justified it. because if they didn’t like it in the first place, they wouldn’t have done it and created reasons for them.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          . because if they didn’t like it in the first place, they wouldn’t have done it and created reasons for them.

          I hear the european monks did it specifically because it’s ugly.