I think they’ve been watching too much porn.
Kaboom is a fascist. They’ve been posting a lot more and I think it’s because the check from the Kremlin finally cleared.
Yup! There’s like 3 people who post in that fascist little community, and he is an open Christian Nationalist.
It’s so funny to dunk on them though, because they seem to actually believe the bullshit that gets shovelled down their throats by the insane reactionary media they use to work themselves into a rage.
They think they portray themselves like reasonable scholars, but to anyone outside their little bubble they sound like bath-salt snorting weirdos. Anything that cracks that bubble is deleted immediately by the chief weirdo who mods over there.
As a proud shit stirrer, I’ve got to say I’ve never seen a good take from that instance, but I’m also not entirely certain it’s not one person.
Nah, also only see terrible takes from that instance
It’s one of the worst in my experience, sh!tjustworks too
I don’t think any of them compare to lemmy.world. I’ve seen people openly right wing there, and I’ve seen them downvote people for no apparent reason other than being openly trans. I’ve been trying to report these incidents when they happen but I feel like it’s useless since they never do anything, even when the people are homed on their instance.
Really? I’m not saying you’re lying but that’s not been my experience at all. I do block extremely liberally and have since I came here during the first reddexodus so maybe I’ve just stayed ahead of the idiot assholes
Probably, most of the ones on Lemmy.world are on the covert side, using dogwhistles and subtle language, to convey their points that most other people, mods included usually miss.
What’s the little community?
I don’t want to link to it directly, but it’s pretty much the only conservative community on Lemmy.
Idk. They seem the type to do it for free/love of the game
I can’t imagine anything more “snowflake” than posting from a server that has disabled downvoted. They have no idea how universally hated their politics are.
Kaboom gets his chèque from different Eastern Europeans.
I consider genocide to be.the dictionary definition, not his cherry picked personal definition
I actually saw this guy replying to one of my comments in !trans@lemmy.blahaj.zone hard to believe he isn’t banned sitewide there. They usually ban alt-right fash like him pretty quickly.
Probably Yogthos’ second job
Fellas, is it gay to have family?
Yes if the family has children that are the same gender as you and you love them; totally gay.
what if I only see them as friends?
Not gay but only if you say no homo anytime there is accidental physical contact.
And intentional physical contact? Or is that verboten?
100% gay.
Having friends is a sign of weakness, and therefore, gay.
Look in the general direction of the same gender?
Believe it or not, also gay.
Only if you have a son, then you’re sharing her insides with another guy
But I thought sharing a lady’s insides is still not gay as long as your balls aren’t touching?
Conservatives barely care for their own children, which explains their almost complete disdain for others’ kids
Cuckoldry has no temporal dimension
If a conservative’s wife had sex with someone before she married him, the conservative is a cuck. In order to avoid this humiliation, conservatives advocate marrying children. This is consistent and inevitable logic
Pedocon theory is a theory like gravity is a theory.
I’m ready for my interview.
Were you devastated to find out this way?
Shook, is a better term, I think.
I needed a cup of warm soy milk to calm my nerves.
Is your username a Doc Scratch reference?
No, DaddyScratch was the result of my real name into a Rap Name Generator back in 2009.
Is there a reason you use uncommon terms to refer to family members?
Eg “wife’s son” vs “stepson”?
Or was the kid your offspring and you just wanted to bait that loser?
It was 100% trolling. I’m not married and neither my partner nor myself have any children.
It’s playing into the liberal soyboy cuck stereotype.
To be fair, I don’t think “wife’s son” is all that weird to begin with. I’d think it just means you aren’t close with your girlfriend’s kids yet.
[edit] ‘wife’, married, right. I just realized. Still, I don’t think it’s that weird.
Deleted
Goodness, your trolling is god-tier! It’s so funny seeing how many people in this thread, including op, are taking your comment at face value. It’s satire of the highest level: easy to miss as a bystander, yet devastating to the target.
I will say anything to wind up a nazi. Anything
Are you okay?
I am actually doing quite well, thank you for asking.
Christ, Kaboom is embarrassing. Just on every level – as a man, as a person, as someone on lemmy, as a person who making jokes, just everything. God he’s embarrassing.
There really should be a word for someone who acts so tacky, but is unaware that they are doing so. I guess “conservative” will have to do.
I think we need to use the ‘bootlicker’ word more, because we need to point out these are people stanning for rich people. So it’s some combination of ‘self-made slave,’ ‘cruel,’ and ‘tactless.’
Either way, it’s like watching someone elses kid on the playground eating cat shit out of the sand box.
It takes a real man who is confident and loving enough to take someone else’s child in and treat them as their own. I can only hope that whomever my ex-wife gets serious with will do this for my children when they are with her. “It takes a village” after all.
Isn’t the OP the bull? It’s the OP’s wife’s ex who is the cuck. I’m not agreeing with the asshole but I think the definitions are mixed up.
If true, then one day (soon) I’ll be a cuck too. 😅 😂 😬
He never had a dad that cared about him?
I have a feeling you can change that question mark to a period of you want lol
Who else falls for the “strongman” gift.
If you grow up without a dad, a man can go one of two ways:
-
I’m going to have to be the dad I never had, for myself. I need to be the hero and source of love and safety he didn’t know how to give or provide.
-
Yeah, new daddy’s right. Its all those damn women and immigrants fault.
-
Stop feeding the trolls.
You really refer to your stepson as your wife’s son in casual conversation? That’s highly unusual. You can’t respond to a text conversation over the internet because you’re going to go do something for an hour or two? This is dishonest as fuck, the guy is clearly mentally handicapped based on the post history and you’re baiting him, be it consciously or unconsiously, so that you can farm fake internet updoot points.
Stop filling the fediverse with your reddit tier personal drama. No one gives a fuck that a moron is capable of typing a post on internet. You’re acting a clown responding to it genuinely, and validating it with this blog post. This is how these people find the motivation to band together and make their little incel cults.
I’m not sure how successful they are at farming fake internet points when I’m the only other person who saw it and up voted it.
You ok bud? Maybe avoid this community if you don’t want to see stupid drama? You know, since that’s the entire point?
And for the record, laughing at reactionaries is absolutely the right way to deal with them; they are incapable of introspection, so exposing them as the fools they are keeps other people from falling for their bullshit.
It’s not actually unusual to refer to them as such, especially if they didn’t go through a formal adoption process. I wouldn’t say it’s common where I’m from, but certainly not noteworthy.
I don’t think we should feed the trolls either but suggesting OP is responsible for others making incel cults is extreme.
Word count: 134
JFC that guys comment and post history. And that doesn’t include all the ones that were removed
Why can’t he just say his son or stepson?
Correct take. “Wife’s son” taken genuinely gives off very strong distancing vibes. It feels like he’s trying to disown or reject his relationship to the stepson. It’s kind of like when people say “baby mama” to refer to their current partner. No, there’s no direct link between them and myself: we’re just related by this other secondary relationship.
“my wife’s _” is such a huge meme that it feels forced to even try reading it genuinely when a more organic way of wording it is available.
IMHO you don’t get to call them that until they call you dad, and that doesn’t necessarily happen the moment you get married.
My mother in law married someone while my wife was an adult. She would never call him dad, and he would never call her daughter, that doesn’t mean they aren’t family or aren’t close.
Nonsense, you call eachother how you see them. If my stepson doesn’t call me dad that’s fine, he’s still my stepson
They have quite a history…
https://aussie.zone/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=6171569
And this is ONE small server
Holy crap!
Some of those comments could seem like an extreme joke of conservative beliefs, but when you take the rest of the comments they actually believe it - that’s a terrifying level of far right nutso.
Most recent stuff is denying the Genocide in Gaza and stanning for israel lmao.
They seem quite proud of it too, this was their response when questioned about it:
https://reddthat.com/comment/13725720“Removed by mod”
Maybe they have been banned.
Maybe, that’s weird, it’s still up on my instance and they’ve been still able to respond
https://discuss.online/comment/11427017
Can’t they just say stepson? It is still pretty funny tbh
Yeah, it definitely sounds like they’re going for the “my wife’s boyfriend” meme.
They could just say “son” too, but that might depend more on their relationship.
Stepson might involve some kind of adoption, or, I don’t know… My dad remarried when I was in my late teens, but I didn’t see him much. His wife has never been referred to as my stepmom, etc, but my situation might be different due to a lack of closeness. The OP clearly has some kind of relationship with the kid since they are going to pick them up, but I can see how they might not have that kind of label.
Stepchildren don’t have to be adopted to be considered stepchildren.
Damn I thought I was the only idiot on reddthat.com.
I mean, if you take the word literally, as in cuckoo, he is technically right. Even more so than the actual meaning of cuck. Since cuckoos don’t bang other birds’ partners, but make them raise children that aren’t theirs.
Wouldn’t that make the wifes former partner the cuck? Not the current one?
Based on the bird behavior it would be closer, yeah.
Looking at the etymology, it seems the middle English just used the word for the whole situation, and not a strict analogy.For pure bird-ness, it would apply best to a case of a woman adopting a step child, even more to adoption, and most of all to a single mother with three kids who one day realizes she’s not sure how long there have been four babies in her house, and even though one is three times the size of the others and looks very different, they all have similar lower faces so she can’t really tell and feeds them all just to be safe.
very true, i didn’t think of that
