Details are still scant, but…

“I mean, he had a lot of ammunition in that house, and certainly … all of us were strapped, you know, with ammunition, and we were calling for additional ammunition,” Kraus said. “Like I said, we tried to give him every opportunity to come out.”

    …I’ll go way out on a limb and suggest that this could’ve been handled better.

  • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    So I can just take all your stuff and you’re fine with it because fuck private property?

    There are huge problems in the current system but just letting the person with the most guns do whatever they want is not a good solution

    • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it prevents someone from being homeless without risking someone else (or me) being homeless then yes. Private property should not be of a higher concern than someone having shelter.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You could be helping hundreds of people in poor countries survive, but you’re not. You should be selling your property and donating the proceeds to UNICEF or similar.

        • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you not understand the difference between taking from someone that’s hoarding a resource required by society and taking everything someone owns?