Details are still scant, but…

“I mean, he had a lot of ammunition in that house, and certainly … all of us were strapped, you know, with ammunition, and we were calling for additional ammunition,” Kraus said. “Like I said, we tried to give him every opportunity to come out.”

    …I’ll go way out on a limb and suggest that this could’ve been handled better.

  • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it prevents someone from being homeless without risking someone else (or me) being homeless then yes. Private property should not be of a higher concern than someone having shelter.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You could be helping hundreds of people in poor countries survive, but you’re not. You should be selling your property and donating the proceeds to UNICEF or similar.

      • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you not understand the difference between taking from someone that’s hoarding a resource required by society and taking everything someone owns?