I’m using EndeavourOS with KDE.

The display is correctly oriented when logged in but it doesn’t rotate correctly when I’m logged out.

EDIT: corrected the post. This happens when logged out, locking the screen has it displayed correctly.

  • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah that difference in configuration definitely makes it so much better, it completely outweighs the fact that Wayland does proper multi-monitor VRR, fractional scaling, HDR and much more.

    • uhN0id@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not OP comment but I had no idea Wayland supported all of that. Thanks for sharing! I really need to leave my Linux bubble more often.

      • doona@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        And now you know why it’s so funny to read people on the internet exclaiming that X11 is so much better despite its lack of development…

    • AnIndefiniteArticle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve never needed any of those things.

      I do need to change monitor configurations.

      I once had an old TV that I used as a monitor that had 1027p worth of pixels instead of 1080p. Auto detection tools said it was 1080p. With xrandr I was able to modify the output to 1027p so I didn’t lose the edges of the display to the TV’s broken forced overscan design. Could you do that with Wayland?

      • frozenA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Literally yes. And you don’t even need to know the exact pixel resolution of the TV.

        Edit: Here are the problems with you “Wayland isn’t good enough” people.

        First, you don’t use Wayland, so you don’t even know if it’s fixed whatever weird issue you encountered with it before or if it supports a niche use case, for example.

        Second, Wayland won’t get good enough for you until you start using it and reporting bugs. You think X11 was a bed of roses when it first started? Or do you think they bumped the version number 11 times for fun?

        • doona@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          First, you don’t use Wayland, so you don’t even know if it’s fixed whatever weird issue you encountered with it before or if it supports a niche use case, for example.

          Bingo. So many complaints I’ve seen about Wayland have been from Nvidia users who tried it three years ago when the driver support was beyond fucked. I get Linux development moves slow sometimes but holy shit…

        • AnIndefiniteArticle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Good to know that this has been implemented in your favorite DE! Considering how Wayland often implements things, it’s probably implemented on the DE-level, leading to a fractured configuration ecosystem. Being implemented in Wayland is different from being implemented in some of the DEs that use Wayland.

          edit: if I’m wrong about that, and it is implemented in Wayland itself, please continue to correct me!