It’s an interesting one and maybe not as straightforward on first thought, are you judging on silverware? League position, how the players performed under them?
Because essentially they’ve all been sacked and left the club ok not the best terms and we have Ten Hag who we’ll see about. But as far as success, player performance despite what you may think of him, it’s gotta be Mourinho hasn’t it? Ten Hag hasn’t got a clue what his style of play is and is just as bad a man manager as modern mourinho so it’s up in the air to me.
Who would you say has been the best?
In order it’s Jose, ole, lvg, then eth or moyes. Moyes had the worst pl finish but eth has had some of the worst results in the club’s history while playing awful football despite being backed
Mourinho for me, only time I was worried about them actually sorting their shit out
Ole or Mourinho. Jose revealed the real problems behind closed doors and imo Ole deserved more time/support
Roughly equal in terms of success, but I have to put Ole as #1 because the vibes and football were good - there was a lot of games I genuinely enjoyed
I agree
Hahahahahahahahahaha,
Oh this is serious.
Everyone laughed when Mourinho said finish second with that United team was one of his best achievements.
Proved himself right yet again.
And yet Ole also did it. Mourinho is full of shit, yet in time a few things he says people think are sage-like. No, United are still just shit, doesn’t mean it’s inevitable. They’ve just not improved.
Sure.
Nearly all of Joses quotes about manU have aged so well, he was right all along
He hasn’t been proven right. He had a great team full of winners.
No I think he has.
He hasn’t, he had Rooney, zlatan, Pogba loads of great players. You’re just falling for mou pr.
And if you think any of those mentioned were at their best during his tenure, you’re falling for their pr. The reality is, Mourinho had a team of vastly overrated players and managed to get them playing to an expected level. After he left, look what happened.
That’s been true of every United manager, but comparing them all Mourinho easily has the best team.
I mean that’s still a stupid thing to say and he did a terrible job there
None so far
That doesnt make sense.
- Michael Carrick
- Solkjaer
- Mourinho
- Giggs
- Van Gaal
- Ten Hag
- That German dude that nobody remembers
The most fun watching United has come from Ole-ball. Sure it had its downsides and was pretty inconsistent at times but the exhilaration of some of those large margin victories and performances makes it worth it.
jose mourinho.
complain about him being boring.
he got the results.
honestly don’t think ole was that bad either despite being one of the only managers since fergie to not win a trophy
Pep
Oh sorry, wrong timeline.
It’s like asking which is the least shitiest washing machine
Mourinho probably achieved the most, but for me it was Ole. I think he was the closest to getting United back on track long term. All the other managers felt like they wanted instant short term success, whereas Ole seemed to be building for longevity, I really think signing Ronaldo unfortunately killed all the progress he’d made, but it felt to me like he was getting somewhere for a time.
Ole ole ole
Oi oi oi.
Jose got axed for locker room tensions more so. He would have made champions. He was seen as the bad guy because of his reputation, the next manager soured on Pogba too and that’s when people said Jose was right. If that was Jose exiling Sancho the narrative would be worse I’m sure.
If you look at how Sir Alex started at Man U, if he did that today, he would get sacked.
Surely mourinho :)))))