you’re willing to use a horrific tragedy to justify taking blood money while taking the moral high ground

lol wtf does that even mean.
Your club sings about the Munich disaster, takes sponsorship money from a terrorism supporting bank, hacks other clubs to steal scouting data, has feral fans who attack opposition team coaches or throw pint pots full of coins in the stadium etc. The list goes on. I’m very happy to not be associated with scumbaggery like that.

As I replied to the other bullshitter:
https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fnnkd2u49xw0b1.jpg

In my book “no evidence” = exonerated

They got off cos it was too long in the past

No, that’s the bullshit narrative that is pushed on here and certain sections of the media. The truth is there was no evidence:
https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fnnkd2u49xw0b1.jpg
That’s directly from the CAS judgement which I’m sure you’ve already read(lol)

I wouldn’t support my club if they caused the entire league to be banned from European football due to the disgusting behaviour of their own supporters which resulted in the deaths of dozens of innocent people. The fans are the heart and soul of a club and that kind of stain is very difficult to wash away, can’t imagine myself carrying on supporting after that.

They wouldn’t do anything to hurt their favorite little golden child

lol wat. Then why charge City at all after they were wholly exonerated by CAS? The charges have already done plenty of damage because your average know-nothing red club fan presumes guilt from the outset which the media happily tap into.

financially doping

Used to be called investing until Wenger’s mental breakdown

Fulham vs Arsenal if you want the proper old school traditional experience as Craven Cottage is a lot older and smaller a stadium. West Ham vs Brighton is the most attractive fixture on paper but not a good ground to watch football in.