Yeah dude, this Reuters article came from Google news. Obviously this Reuters is just another “shitty” illegitimate, random fake-news click farming pro-Tesla blog too since it didn’t put out pro-union story. Thanks so for clearing that up 🙄🙄
They are the top hits under google news. If you don’t think google news feed is wrong, take it up with Google. They seem to report Tesla news good or bad and include citations/ links to their Swedish news sources and opinion pieces. Seems neutral. But u r free to show better news source and l why it’s wrong. Don’t just say “ Fake News” like some Trump supporter.
As I understand it, USA labor law still allows sympathy strikes under two conditions: 1) employer refuses to collectively bargain with another union and 2) abnormally dangerous working conditions. However, most collective bargaining agreements have contractual no-strike clause language in them to prohibit a union from participating in a situation #1 sympathy strike on behalf of another union.
As I understand it, USA labor law still allows sympathy strikes under two conditions: 1) employer refuses to collectively bargain with another union and 2) abnormally dangerous working conditions. However, most collective bargaining agreements have contractual no-strike clause language in them to prohibit a union from participating in a situation #1 sympathy strike on behalf of another union.
As I understand it, USA labor law still allows sympathy strikes under two conditions: 1) employer refuses to collectively bargain with another union and 2) abnormally dangerous working conditions. However, most collective bargaining agreements have contractual no-strike clause language in them to prohibit a union from participating in a situation #1 sympathy strike on behalf of another union.
CR is probably the best at quantitative reliability data collection to prevent need for serving. (As an aside, wish their reports had more qualitative weight. For example, a recall that says “replace X” should be dinged more than “inspect X”.)