?

Politische Entscheidungen rein auf Ideologie zu treffen, sei es rechts oder links, ist in meinen Augen ein Ausdruck unter anderem dessen, dass man die Vielfältigkeit an Problemen nicht sieht oder sehen möchte. Man ist überfordert mit dem Mittelweg, der mehr Kompromisse und Alternativen verlangt, ja, die Angelegenheit aus anderen Standpunkten heraus anzugehen. Wie gesagt, dies sehe ich weder bei links noch bei rechts, weil ideologische Betrachtungen diesen Ansatz grundweg ausschliessen. Deswegen sehe ich in beiden Strömungen nichts Gutes, was man an Russland (rechts), Venezuela (links) gut sehen kann.

Ich weiss nicht, was in deinem Leben schief gelaufen ist, auf jeden Fall, eine ganze Menge, dass du so einen Stuss blubberst.

Ohne die Linken, keine Rechten.

Dann fang bei dir an.

Volksvertreter findest du auf beiden Seiten. Linke und Rechte eint, dass sie meinen, die Welt zu verstehen, nur etwas auf die Reihe gebracht, haben es häufig weder die einen noch die anderen.

Genau, alle, die nicht deiner Meinung sind, sind sofort «Naziiiii ». Muss du nicht schon im Bett sein?

Ehre, wem Ehre gebührt. Hast mich überrascht mit deiner Antwort.

Du weisst, dass Lemmy eigentlich nicht für Kinder wie dich gedacht ist. Dafür hast du Reddit.

Genau, solange du nicht heulend zu den Cops läufst, nachdem dir einige die Fresse poliert haben. Dann sind die Cops plötzlich ganz ok. Has’mal beim Psycho gefragt, ob‘se Pippi Langstrumpf Syndrom hast?

Für Analphabeten janz hilfreisch.

Ich denke, du schliesst dich da mit ein, oder?

So funktioniert “Polarisation” und davon gibt es reichlich. Brauchen tut man es aber nicht. Vielleicht fehlen paar Lebensjährchen, um das zu verstehen.

Certain Lemmy instances are not much different from the kindergartens over on Reddit. The same type of kids take over mod roles, forcing everyone to follow their ideology - or else, banned!

I would fully support the option on Lemmy to block or ban entire instances that suppress free expression or prevent challenging false claims and narratives. I would also fully support the possibility to complain about a mod and even demand his removal as moderator with the possibility of banning even the mod. So, not only top-down, but also bottom-up - but so think the letter is not possible in Lemmy. Only instances can be closed.

But the attacking line is also much lower. So? 🤷

My three IDE’s of choice in order of preference:

1. EMacs: ultimative workhorse which can do many more - especially with org-mode (however, time intensive to configure which is why I used also ChatGPT to get it done)

2. VSCodium: easy to manage almost anything due to its huge number of extensions

3. Vim: don’t know, sometimes I feel the need to work with Vim and it’s many shortcuts

All are free and open source.

1. In my opinion, you’re doing a great job by not enabling downvotes. Every user can see how many votes their comment has, which should be enough for them to gauge how well their comment is received. 👍

2. I haven’t been on Stack Overflow for a long time (around 15 years ago). Back then, I was mostly focused on statistics and programming in R. It’s true that rude responses were rare, especially in the sense that the OP should have known the answer beforehand or could have researched it themselves before asking. But yes, I never saw personal attacks.

Maybe I’m misunderstanding what you wrote on Reddit, but from what I read, there was nothing even remotely offensive. You simply provided information. Downvoting you for that is just silly.

The downvotes you’re getting here on Lemmy for your comment are equally baseless (current status: 0). It just shows that some people have enough energy to downvote, but not enough to engage in a discussion. Maybe they should save that energy for something more constructive.

Some newspaper forums require identity verification (through paid subscriptions, social media accounts, etc.). These forums are generally much more civil - and we all know why.

I find the concept of downvoting very toxic and discouraging. It can potentially prevent people to express different views, something a discussion and our personal development is thriving on. It can be well seen on Reddit and even on Lemmy, where people with different views get sometimes heavily downvoted. It is something I consider to be close to “cancel culture” - a majority decides not to like your opinion, so it tries to silence you by voting you “out”. I would really love to see that Lemmy removes this feature and just allows to upvote - so you can upvote a comment or not, but you cannot downvote a comment.

This is misleading. While Red Hat contributes significantly to Linux and some open source projects, they did not create the Linux kernel, GCC, or glibc - those are GNU or community projects. You can absolutely use Linux without Red Hat software, especially with distros like Alpine, Gentoo, or Guix. Red Hat is influential, but not essential.