• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of course Yahoo buried the lede:

    While the searches may not be popular, they’re certainly profitable.

    Clayton County records and federal documents show that drug agents find large amounts of cash on passengers at departing gates rather than drugs. Agents have seized millions of dollars, and while travelers aren’t arrested, their money is often administratively forfeited.

    Like most civil forfeiture cases, people who have their money taken must prove in court that their money isn’t connected to drug trafficking or other illegal activity. Seizures like these don’t just happen at the Atlanta airport. They’ve taken place at airports across the country.

    • lingh0e@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      81
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, they REALLY buried the lede with this bit further down. Emphasis added.

      Most travelers are unclear of their rights when it comes to airport searches. In order to be admitted entry to the airport’s gated areas, passengers must submit themselves to TSA security screenings. That’s a fact.

      However, the random searches by DEA agents at the Atlanta airport give passengers pause, but it should be noted that they’re not mandated. The DEA officially calls its stops and searches at airport gates “cold consent encounters,” and passengers are free to end the encounter and walk away if they’d like.

      • toasteecup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        free to end the encounter and walk away if they’d like.

        Well I know what I’m going to do. “Get fucked pig” and walk off.

        • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          1 year ago

          Willing to bet just about anything that the second you try, they’ll find probable cause to detain you

            • Tvkan@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              Might end up on a no fly list and with federal charges, but you’ve surely showed them.

              They have the upper hand, and no amount of imagined badassery will fix this systemic problem.

            • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re welcome to try, but your whole attitude seems rooted in the idea that at the end of the day, the justice system is on your side and that you can beat them at your own game.

              More likely you’ll get arrested, probably have some BS charges thrown at you that the judge will happilly pass through, you’ll never fly again, and maybe even see some jail time.

              There are many valid and important ways to fight back against police injustice. Yelling “get fucked pig” - while satisfying, and even justified - is definitely not one of them, even if talking about doing it does make you feel like a badass lol

        • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You ever had. Real encountered with the police? They’ll just make some shit up and search you anyway best case scenario. More likely is you now upset them and they arrest you for whatever they make up on the spot, I believe there was just a supreme court ruling that they can make up a reason for stops/arrests after the fact and that’s perfectly fine as well.

          So, while I agree with the sentiment, I wouldn’t try anything like that. The police state is real and oppressive. You want to avoid any interaction with it and the US system at all costs.

          • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            DEA isn’t real police though. Mind you i wouldn’t try that shit, i like having teeth and dislike dealing with violent gangs.

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              DEA isn’t real police though.

              Yeah they are and they’re usually even WORSE than regular cops. ACAB means federal cops too.

        • scottywh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Probably safer to at least try “sorry, I don’t have time for this” while just walking away

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah because that’s how encounters with cops ever happen 🙄

        If I had a dollar for every time a cop has murdered someone for failing to obey an unlawful order, I would be rich enough for cops to let me get away with anything!

      • bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The DEA is a failed experiment filled to the brim with corruption and toxicity. It should’ve been dismantled decades ago. Redundant executive agencies have gotten out of control in the US (e.g. Dept of Homeland Sec (DHS), NSA, DEA, etc). There’s nothing the DEA does that the FBI isn’t capable of doing. Same with DHS. And I won’t even get into how the DEA violated the Constitution by essentially writing their own laws regarding drugs (i.e. Controlled Substances Act states that determination if drugs have medical use is to be conducted by the Surgeon General, yet the DEA repeatedly ignored SG and just labels drugs however the fuck they want).

    • anemoia_one@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      1 year ago

      must prove in court that their money isn’t connected to drug trafficking or other illegal activity

      Ah yes, the cornerstone of US law, “guilty until proven innocent”

      • pedro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        62
        ·
        1 year ago

        Generally I would agree with you on that but here aren’t they already guilty of moving large cash amounts without any sort of authorization? (I don’t know if it’s legal or not to transport that much cash in the US)

        • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is legal to carry any amount of cash in the US, as far as i’m aware. The main risk is that the cops will just steal it from you and then there’s no realistic recourse.

          • pedro@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thanks for actually answering instead of just downvoting my question!

        • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          1 year ago

          If it’s your money you can do whatever the hell you want with it. I think title 31 regulates if you are moving money for other people/money laundry, etc

        • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are there rules in some countries about not being allowed to carry as much cash as you want/need? That seems very strange to me as a US citizen. Is it because you might use it for drugs/other off the books transactions? or just because it’s dangerous and you might get robbed?

          • Aqarius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s rules about crossing borders, with the intent of curbing tax evasion and money laundering. But even then it’s mostly an obligation to report.

          • pedro@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            In France it is illegal to have more than 10k€ on your person. So moving large sum of cash is illegal but there might be a way to have a proper authorization to do so?

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s perfectly legal in the US to carry any amount of cash, but …… asset forfeiture has turned into a situation where if police assume it was used for a crime, they can steal it from you without actually proving there was a crime committed.

          While I can see that in a lot of cases large amounts of cash are related to crimes, there are also plenty of cases where that’s not true. More importantly it’s a workaround for your Constitutional protections that should be illegal as hell

    • renlok@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      How is this allowed in US, it’s what you might expect from a police force in a third world country