• haha_suh_dude@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree with him here. Based mostly on what I feel, I think it should be Neto. Toney just doesn’t move me like that, but I can understand the argument.

    • bad_at_proofs@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not convinced Toney would ve anywhere near as good when playing for a team that isn’t built around him. Neto seems like he would fit our team much better.

    • CakeBrigadier@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Toney is gonna be too expensive for what he is. I really think isak would have been perfect for us. Let’s wait til next summer and see who’s the next up and coming talent instead of a 28 year old English forward

        • nebulaEchoo@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          For the price he would cost, I would rather we spend it on a player with good resale value.

        • Sam101294@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          True but only if the late 20s player you’re buying is cheap. Like Trossard, since they won’t have any resale value at the end of their contract. Our club doesn’t have unlimited money and we’re already close to FFP limitations that buying Toney for 60+ would be too rich for kse