“This ‘groundbreaking’ AI proposal that they gave us yesterday, they proposed that our background performers should be able to be scanned, get one day’s pay, and their companies should own that scan, their image, their likeness and should be able to use it for the rest of eternity on any project they want, with no consent and no compensation. So if you think that’s a groundbreaking proposal, I suggest you think again.”

  • dudebro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because they don’t need more money.

    They need to spend less. It’s not about putting food on the table. It’s about living as lavish a lifestyle as possible to show off in front of your peers.

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hmm I think you’re thinking about like the 1% of actors who are rich and famous.

      Most actors are not in that situation. They are just working people like anyone else only their income is precarious like any freelancer.

      • dudebro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, I’m thinking about the vast majority of people who live in LA.

        They’re just passing a bunch of money around at the top. As soon as they make more, prices go up and the world’s poorest continue to stagnate.

        • livus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Surely even in LA a lot of the actors are waiters/bit part extras?

          As for world poverty I agree it’s more inportant than better payment for workers in wealthy nations, but I think it’s ok to care about both.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess I wasn’t one of the vast majority of people who lived in L.A. I was just working crew and occasional actor. My money went to things like rent and food. Weirdly, most of my colleagues were in the same boat.

          Now admittedly, there are millions of people in L.A., but a lot of the ones in the entertainment industry sure as hell weren’t passing money around, we were barely making a living.

          • dudebro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, a living in one of the most expensive cities in the world.

            You could be living a cheaper life anywhere else, but you feel entitled to live in LA.

            No sympathy from me. Spread out.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              I live in a cheaper place now. Indiana. My quality of life is not especially different. I didn’t feel entitled to live in L.A., I went where I could put my skills to good use. Being paid a low wage in L.A. was a higher wage than a low wage in Indiana, but the cost of living is also higher.

              Maybe don’t make guesses about how other people live their lives.

              And let me guess- I shouldn’t have moved to Indiana, I should have moved to Botswana or something if I don’t want to feel “entitled.”

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So I don’t feel “entitled” to live in a first-world country where I have things like running water and electricity? Seems like the same sort of “entitled” as living in a city where you have a job that you think is the best job for what you want to do with your life. Shouldn’t I be working in a strip mine in Mongolia or not ever complain about my life?

                  Or is Los Angeles somehow a special case?

                  • dudebro@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I just said Indiana was fine.

                    California is the most expensive state to live in. People don’t need to live there and would be using capital more efficiently elsewhere.

                    I’m not in the camp of “all or nothing.” I think magnitude matters and we can all be doing more to reduce the disparity in wealth besides “making more money.”

        • Djtecha@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          OK we get it. You hate actors and anything that gets close to them. Now go hang out in shit posts.

          • dudebro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, I don’t hate actors. You clearly don’t get it.

            I keep saying I have no sympathy for greedy people. Globally speaking, most people living in LA are wealthy. They’re just passing that wealth around at the top which is why other places of the world stagnate.

            It’s a cultural issue. You’re just upset someone is criticizing that culture of consumerism.

            • Djtecha@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re not making any useful point. Just screaming into the void. I’m not really sure how you don’t see this as turning into a much bigger problem. When Ai is able to synthesis human labor those at the bottom get fucked first.

              • dudebro@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’ve been very clear about the points I’m making.

                Are you arguing we shouldn’t replace labor with robots because humans wouldn’t have to work? Can you see how backwards that is?

    • keeb420@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I might could agree aaa level actors don’t need more money, there’s plenty who do. And not just actors but most everyone who makes the movies and shows we enjoy gets fucked by the producers and studios.

      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess the point is that money is being made and when it isn’t going to the people actually involved in productions, it goes straight to studio executives and shareholders, including those same execs. If films are making a lot of money, why should people on certain rungs of the production ladder be working paycheque to paycheque or be being strongarmed in to signing away any hope of future earnings.

      • dudebro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t really think you know the difference between ‘want’ and ‘need.’

        It’s not like these people are surviving off of peanut butter sandwiches, lol. A lot of them probably think they’re too good to shop at places like Walmart, too.

        No, they get no sympathy from me. Not while children go without food, water, shelter, electricity, and education.

        • keeb420@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          things are worse elsewhere so they shouldnt try to improve their life. great response.

          i hope when you need a pay raise your boss has the same attitude.

          • dudebro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No. People who have more wealth than average don’t deserve more so long as children go without: food, water, electricity, education, and shelter.

            Instead of lying about what I’m saying, why not try to argue against it? Why do you people keep putting words in my mouth? Oh yeah, because it’s easier to argue against than what I’m actually saying.

            • keeb420@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              your whole argument is things are worse in africa so they shouldnt get any more money. its a bullshit argument. everyone deserves to live a better life. with that argument we might as well go back to the robber baron days because people had it worse than the striking workers even back then. after all why should someone with 4 walls a roof and a bed complain about their working conditions, others have it worse. “oh your 7yo lost her right arm in an industrial accident? dont complain theres people who dont have any jobs to go to.” great argument.

              yes we as a whole global community should be doing a lot more for the least of us but most of the people that bring us entertainment arent swimming in gold pools ala scrooge mcduck. like the vast majority of americans they are barely getting by. and besides the money not going to everyone else making movies and tv shows arent going to make the lives of anyone else better but the studio execs and producers.

              • dudebro@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sorry, I didn’t read that long-winded comment.

                You didn’t seem like you had anything crucial to say, just trying to double-down on rich people getting richer at everyone else’s expense.

            • Thekingoflorda@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Would you take a pay raise? Because you probably don’t really deserve it with your fancy internet connection.

              • dudebro@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t need a pay raise, but I would definitely take one.

                I’d rather have copyright and patent laws die.