“This ‘groundbreaking’ AI proposal that they gave us yesterday, they proposed that our background performers should be able to be scanned, get one day’s pay, and their companies should own that scan, their image, their likeness and should be able to use it for the rest of eternity on any project they want, with no consent and no compensation. So if you think that’s a groundbreaking proposal, I suggest you think again.”

  • dudebro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, I’m thinking about the vast majority of people who live in LA.

    They’re just passing a bunch of money around at the top. As soon as they make more, prices go up and the world’s poorest continue to stagnate.

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Surely even in LA a lot of the actors are waiters/bit part extras?

      As for world poverty I agree it’s more inportant than better payment for workers in wealthy nations, but I think it’s ok to care about both.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess I wasn’t one of the vast majority of people who lived in L.A. I was just working crew and occasional actor. My money went to things like rent and food. Weirdly, most of my colleagues were in the same boat.

      Now admittedly, there are millions of people in L.A., but a lot of the ones in the entertainment industry sure as hell weren’t passing money around, we were barely making a living.

      • dudebro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, a living in one of the most expensive cities in the world.

        You could be living a cheaper life anywhere else, but you feel entitled to live in LA.

        No sympathy from me. Spread out.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I live in a cheaper place now. Indiana. My quality of life is not especially different. I didn’t feel entitled to live in L.A., I went where I could put my skills to good use. Being paid a low wage in L.A. was a higher wage than a low wage in Indiana, but the cost of living is also higher.

          Maybe don’t make guesses about how other people live their lives.

          And let me guess- I shouldn’t have moved to Indiana, I should have moved to Botswana or something if I don’t want to feel “entitled.”

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              So I don’t feel “entitled” to live in a first-world country where I have things like running water and electricity? Seems like the same sort of “entitled” as living in a city where you have a job that you think is the best job for what you want to do with your life. Shouldn’t I be working in a strip mine in Mongolia or not ever complain about my life?

              Or is Los Angeles somehow a special case?

              • dudebro@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I just said Indiana was fine.

                California is the most expensive state to live in. People don’t need to live there and would be using capital more efficiently elsewhere.

                I’m not in the camp of “all or nothing.” I think magnitude matters and we can all be doing more to reduce the disparity in wealth besides “making more money.”

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If California was totally depopulated, another state would be the most expensive state and you could make the same claim.

                  • dudebro@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Not really. It’s supply and demand. Even if another state were the new most expensive, that doesn’t mean it will be as expensive as California is now.

    • Djtecha@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      OK we get it. You hate actors and anything that gets close to them. Now go hang out in shit posts.

      • dudebro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, I don’t hate actors. You clearly don’t get it.

        I keep saying I have no sympathy for greedy people. Globally speaking, most people living in LA are wealthy. They’re just passing that wealth around at the top which is why other places of the world stagnate.

        It’s a cultural issue. You’re just upset someone is criticizing that culture of consumerism.

        • Djtecha@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re not making any useful point. Just screaming into the void. I’m not really sure how you don’t see this as turning into a much bigger problem. When Ai is able to synthesis human labor those at the bottom get fucked first.

          • dudebro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve been very clear about the points I’m making.

            Are you arguing we shouldn’t replace labor with robots because humans wouldn’t have to work? Can you see how backwards that is?