• krellor@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    42 minutes ago

    I get that these terms get tossed around without people knowing what they mean, and I’m not against language evolving. But liberalism was never really intended to describe wherever you are on a progressive-conservative spectrum.

    Pulling from Wikipedia, but it’s a similar definition in most texts.

    Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on the rights of the individual, liberty, consent of the governed, political equality, right to private property, and equality before the law.

    Classical liberals just tended to look progressive compared to people who weren’t liberals, because, well, read the definition. The countervailing force to liberalism is authoritarianism. It’s more of a government legitimacy and structure philosophy.

  • CardboardDecoy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I feel like this all ignored the complete bastardization of any sense of language or definition in American politics. None of these words mean anything and engaging in it is playing party to the fucked up games people have invented to delay any sort of growth or action.

    “Neoliberal conservativeism” was a thing. They’re all nazis now. ‘Liberals’ is a slur against anyone who isn’t left enough. ‘Liberalism’ is the blood-shy self-blind median our parents and grandparents wanted for us so we didn’t have to watch our friends die in imperialists wars in Asia. Libertarianism was supposed to be a rejection of any of this and got coopelted by some of the most evil freaks in the system. The Left represents the most meaningful and poplist messaging we can mannage and is still consumed by bickering from people who can’t walj and chew gum or breathe at the same time.

    Stop trying to argue the labels.

    • chloroken@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Reading this comment indicates you have a lsss-than-desirable understanding of politics.

      I want you to literally get a dictionary and encyclopedia and look up each term you just used. You’re about to learn some wild shit and become slightly less chauvinistic and ignorant.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Ah, the Great American lie. Well one of them. The idea that American liberalism is somehow different. And yet when you actually start examining it it looks exactly the same. I mean you just said that liberalism in America is Anti-Imperialist and anti-war. If you’ve never opened a history book I suppose you might have come to that conclusion. How else you do it I have no fucking idea.

      • jimmy90@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 minutes ago

        well yes it is capitalism with regulation

        better that that populist bullshitters that have no idea what they’re doing

        look at this magical dream! every time we get in control and try to get to it, it turns into a genocidal nightmare. yipeeeeee

    • cuerdo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The truth is dead. There is no democracy, there is no politics. Just rich people throwing bones.

      USA is just an oligopoly.

  • Brainsploosh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Liberalism is therefore a right of center, a.k.a. conservative, ideal.

    When Liberalism requires and promotes directing money towards a commons used to lift and/or equalise people in need, that’s where it’s starting to touch upon left of center.