- Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
Snoopy
- What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
Community ban
- Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
- Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/ comment that was removed, or got you banned).
I woke up to suddenly being banned with a dm that was misgendering me. It appears the real reason I was banned was due to fact I was critical of Piefed’s recent actions.
Snoopy has no evidence that “I personally released the exploits into the wild" It was actually @yogthos@lemmy.ml who did the deed. I’m not technically enough to be pull it off, nor do I want to.
- Explain why you think it’s unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.
Hopefully unbanned and unblocked.
For people genuinely wanting links for context, I’ve talked about some of Sunshine’s history in previous comments. https://lemmy.world/post/33055701/18273538
I didn’t know about some of the things mentioned here, but it wouldn’t surprise me. Using so many alts makes it hard to document these things. I expect that’s probably intentional.
Why do you and Hamid keep saying she had anything to do with the Vegan v. .world events? It was only naevaTheRat and Eevoltic that took action against two users in the vegan community, causing .world’s Rooki to interfere and leading to a back and forth between the parties. The modlog is still available for all to see.
They discuss Beaver/Sunshine in some of the comments of that timeline summary post. I don’t think she took mod action against Rooki but IIRC her constant drama led to the vegan community moving soon after.
She’s named by TheTechnician27, who was a newly appointed Vegan moderator, about a month after the “cat drama” though. Based on my observations at the time, the original Vegan moderators left and appointed someone new to take over because of .world’s actions (e.g. see this comment from naeva).
TheTechnician27’s understanding of the prior events seems lacking, as they argue she was at “the center of the recent controversy [involving] Lemmy administrator Rooki”, offering no evidence and going against the facts of the modlog. Perhaps that’s the source of misinformation here, because you say something very similar: “As Beaver, they put the lemmy.world vegan community in trouble with admins over that vegan cat food drama”. That part is simply not true.