• artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Inside out tracking requires an array of cameras

    The cameras are the size of a pea

    and a processor as well as a way to cool it.

    Where’s the processor in the Bigscreen Beyond? 🤔

    • Communist
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nonexistant because it doesn’t have inside-out tracking…

      the cameras themselves are not the problem, it’s all the processing and cooling required to make that work along with the processing for passthrough and many other things. I doubt this headset would be much lighter if it was not standalone and still had inside out tracking.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nonexistant because it doesn’t have inside-out tracking…

        It is existent. It still has outside in tracking, which is processed…on the computer. There’s no reason inside out can’t be processed the same way.

        • Communist
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          It would need a massive amount of throughput and latency, try a usb webcam and notice how shit it is, same problem.

          • artyom@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            They’re already streaming 2k/144HZ games. They have a massive amount of throughput. They’d have even more if it were wired

            • Communist
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              That’s making use of a one way port, I can’t plugin a displayport backwards.

              • artyom@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                There is no port. It’s wireless. And it’s bidirectional. How do you think the positional data would make it back to the PC if it weren’t?

                • Communist
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Wow it’s actually a usb-a port, I don’t know how they’re sending that much data over it but it’s certainly close to its limits, there’s a reason most monitors aren’t usb and all usb webcams suck

                  • artyom@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    You’re talking about the router? Yes. Not only that but it works on usb2.

                    I don’t know how they’re sending that much data over it

                    They’re making use of new technology they call foveated streaming. It only streams the content you’re looking directly at in full resolution.