Just don’t donate and disable the nag, it doesn’t really matter, he gains nothing from you if you do this.

If you do this and don’t point to actual issues with the code you’re wasting everybodies time and don’t know what vibe coded means.

What do you think I believe that’s false, and why?

That’s because systemd is just good, if it stops being or something better comes along, people will move. There’s no loyalty or entrapment here. This would be bad if a company did it with proprietary software, because then the company could lock people in… this is just nothing like that.

Tbh that’s cope you know this is nothing like a calculator or slide rule.

This is called jagged intelligence in the field and is a very interesting problem to research.

I like posy-cursors

Thank god they’re spending their time and resources on important things like this and not useless things like helping the poor!

project hail mary

everything everywhere all at once

Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind

little miss sunshine

That will mean people make music for the love of the craft again, music has sucked because of commercial incentive, maybe this will revive the craft.

It’s very good at small changes where you just can’t find the documentation, huge timesaver for such things.

Consent-o-matic is a better system, it actually inputs what you want it to answer for cookie banners

No amount of people doing that will ever destroy art or music, the only thing that can is reducing artists living conditions enough to where they can’t make art.

commercial incentives already ruined art if you’re worried about this ruining art.

I don’t think a single one of them believe that pattern prediction vs a human brain is meaningfully distinct, so this argument is worthless to them, it’d be like saying “nuh uh”, you’re not engaging with their beliefs, so, how would this help?

Oh fuck, this absolutely ruins all of my private jet related plans, damn.

That’s from the 90’s, the more modern study shows a pretty big but gradual improvement

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969720374544

Nobody thinks they are the same, some wonder if it can be made to do equivalent things. Nobody needs to hear that what they are doing isn’t thought for the same reason nobody needs to hear that my computer isn’t actually thinking when it’s running slow.

I absolutely do, I’m just tired of this being posted every time someone says an AI is doing a thing, it’s overplayed, social discourse is obviously valuable, this just isn’t a valuable point to make.

People also wouldn’t do this if I said my slow computer was “thinking”.

Nobody does this when people say their computer is “thinking” when it’s running slow, I just don’t see the necessity of pointing this out every time the topic is brought up.

Nobody does this when people say their computer is “thinking” when it’s running slow, I just don’t see the necessity of pointing this out every time the topic is brought up.