• Communist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It would need a massive amount of throughput and latency, try a usb webcam and notice how shit it is, same problem.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re already streaming 2k/144HZ games. They have a massive amount of throughput. They’d have even more if it were wired

      • Communist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s making use of a one way port, I can’t plugin a displayport backwards.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          There is no port. It’s wireless. And it’s bidirectional. How do you think the positional data would make it back to the PC if it weren’t?

          • Communist
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Wow it’s actually a usb-a port, I don’t know how they’re sending that much data over it but it’s certainly close to its limits, there’s a reason most monitors aren’t usb and all usb webcams suck

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              You’re talking about the router? Yes. Not only that but it works on usb2.

              I don’t know how they’re sending that much data over it

              They’re making use of new technology they call foveated streaming. It only streams the content you’re looking directly at in full resolution.