Donald J. Musk@lemmy.today to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoTrump Administration Argues a Judge's Verbal Order Is 'Not Enforceable'www.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up166arrow-down118
arrow-up148arrow-down1external-linkTrump Administration Argues a Judge's Verbal Order Is 'Not Enforceable'www.newsweek.comDonald J. Musk@lemmy.today to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square11fedilink
minus-squareTony Bark@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down1·3 days agoTrump is playing with fire by saying that.
minus-squarewhodrankarnoldpalmer@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34·3 days agoLiterally how? He’s never seen a single consequence that mattered.
minus-squareTony Bark@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down7·3 days agoIf we take it logical extreme, he might as well be asking for a lawless country.
minus-squareSwordgeek@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up28·3 days agoMaybe you missed it, but he has declared complete lawlessness for himself and his cronies. He’s not asking, he has already declared it.
minus-squareTony Bark@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down5·3 days agoI know what he meant. That’s why I said, “if we take to it’s logical extreme.”
minus-squaremiss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·3 days agoLemmy demands an “/s”.
minus-squareTony Bark@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-23 days agoOkay, fine. Here’s a question. If he says a verbal court order isn’t enforceable, why should we follow SCOTUS’ or any lower courts? He is already dismantling systems that not only oversaw what he did, but everyone else.
minus-squarefloofloof@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 days agoBecause the laws will be enforced if you break them, assuming you’re not rich, but not if he breaks them.
Trump is playing with fire by saying that.
Literally how? He’s never seen a single consequence that mattered.
If we take it logical extreme, he might as well be asking for a lawless country.
Maybe you missed it, but he has declared complete lawlessness for himself and his cronies.
He’s not asking, he has already declared it.
I know what he meant. That’s why I said, “if we take to it’s logical extreme.”
Lemmy demands an “/s”.
Okay, fine. Here’s a question. If he says a verbal court order isn’t enforceable, why should we follow SCOTUS’ or any lower courts? He is already dismantling systems that not only oversaw what he did, but everyone else.
Because the laws will be enforced if you break them, assuming you’re not rich, but not if he breaks them.