• Tony Bark@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    If we take it logical extreme, he might as well be asking for a lawless country.

    • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Maybe you missed it, but he has declared complete lawlessness for himself and his cronies.

      He’s not asking, he has already declared it.

      • Tony Bark@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I know what he meant. That’s why I said, “if we take to it’s logical extreme.”

          • Tony Bark@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            Okay, fine. Here’s a question. If he says a verbal court order isn’t enforceable, why should we follow SCOTUS’ or any lower courts? He is already dismantling systems that not only oversaw what he did, but everyone else.

            • floofloof@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Because the laws will be enforced if you break them, assuming you’re not rich, but not if he breaks them.