Please don’t elect Temu Trump (Pierre Poilievre) or Trump’s useful idiot Doug Ford.

  • HungLikeAHoers2010@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    A country losing its way and straying far off from the ideals it originally strived for, becoming the very thing it fought against without realizing. That describes both the USA and Israel to a T.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    “long live the king”, in the very country founded on saying fuck you to the last king. what a shameful display.

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Constitution is terminated (just like he said he would)

      Article I

      Section 9 Powers Denied Congress
          Clause 8 Titles of Nobility and Foreign Emoluments
      
          No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
      

      https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S9-C8-4/ALDE_00013204/

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Trump has been throughly wiping his ass with the constitution since the day he stepped into the whitehouse.

        It’s just meaningless paper until someone actually steps up and enforces it.

  • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Maybe that’s the motivation for invading Canada. Trump the First, by the grace of God, of Canada King, Defender of the Faith.

  • asg101@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest.”

    ~ attributed to Denis Diderot

    • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s a lovely dream, but I’m pretty sure we’ll just come up with a different title for the people who manipulate us.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          This is another Trump special, really. There’s no shortage of titles for the dictator, including just keeping “president”, and he picked the one that’s hardest to defend in terms of the American mythology.

        • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Kings never really went away. Points to the entire British Commonwealth and the UK. Emperors neither. And let’s not get started on priests…yeeeesh!

          Are you talking about specifically the USA? Because you’ve kept your priests, and treat your Presidents like de-facto kings, their reigns may end but Presidents they remain.

  • BillTongg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Absolute monarchies tend to come to a very sticky end, as happened in England in the 17th century and France in the 18th.

    • LordCrom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Unfortunately, last time the people revolted, the gov only had muskets and heavy canons. This time around, the gov can assassinate you from high altitude with drones, missiles…and the gov forces have firepower that far exceeds what the population could fight against.

      • BillTongg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Good point. The English civil war and the French revolution both went the way they did because the ‘rebels’ had armies which equalled or exceeded those of the government. Same with the other regicide that comes to mind, Nicholas II of Russia in 1918. So much depends on whether the military remains loyal.

        • LordCrom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Right… How would you fight a military that has tanks, drones, fighter jets, Apache helicopters… The people would have what? Handguns, non auto rifles? Maybe some have converted firearms to full auto… It’s still not enough to counter the modern army. Plus you need real intricate coordination, techs to fight the cyber war… I can’t even wrap my head around how normal people could organize enough to mount a real threat.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Unfortunately, there’s never a shortage of people that will sign up to for power in exchange for a risk of dying horribly.

      That’s not even specific to monarchies, every autocracy runs on that principle.

    • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, if they turn a portion of the population into true believers, deport/incarcerate/execute the CIS White remaining who oppose… Could get messy globally. The American Reich could easily be even more of a problem than Mr Niceguy Imperialist America. And that’s saying something.

  • shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I was reading or watching some news story once and it was about these two blokes getting arrested for fucking farm animals. And it started a train of thought. How do two strangers meet who are into fucking farm animals? It isn’t like it is socially acceptable. Its probably not on their dating profile. I get that if you are part of a comparatively common group experiencing social repression you learn ways to communicate. Even pedos. But animal fuckers? Are they that common?

    Now call me autistic if you like but suddenly I realized some of the edgy race jokes I had laughed at when I was younger and dumber might have been actual racists looking to connect with other racists. The sexist and homophobic jokes might have been actual bigots. And the guys joking about fucking animals. Well most of those are just jokes because obviously nobody does that. But perhaps some of them are looking for a special friend because how else does that convo even get started without the plausible deniability of “a joke”.

    So now when I see a fascist dog fucker “joking” about their not meant to be serious fascist memes and symbols the illusion is broken for me. And when I see Presidents joking about being Kings or invading neighbors, it isn’t my type of humor any more I guess.

    • flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m an ADHD person and I had this exact same realization when I was younger.

      I think maybe this isn’t something neurotypicals ever figure out? Because they seem to be accepting of those “jokes” and it blows my mind.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        22 hours ago

        They’re well evolved to survive in social groups. Even if they suspect someone is recruiting for something terrible, the loss of social status and allies isn’t worth confronting the recruiter. Even visibly suspecting it will harm social status. This is a feature, not a bug.

        Historically, the kid who called out the emperor’s new clothes was executed. Every time you started shit in your tribe, you risked being shunned, which meant death. If the whole tribe was crazy, you were better off being crazy too.

    • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Who jokes about these things? Plausible deniability my ass. I ever hear someone joke about fucking animals I’m gonna slowly, no actually, rapidly back away

      • shirro@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Who jokes about these things?

        Exactly. Have you ever heard an elected president joke about being King or invading their peaceful neighbor? Ever? Anyone? Animal fuckers. Its the only thing that makes sense.

      • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        At work we say “there’s many ways to fuck a cat” implying you can do something different ways.

        We also say “it’s not my dog to fuck” when it’s not your job

        Or “I’m fucking the dog” or “they’re fucking the dog” when someone is taking a stupid amount of time to do things.

    • systemglitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Pretty sure it was just really dumb, low IQ dudes, the no one else really liked, who got along and one decided to share or got caught fucking an animal, and since they newcomer was also a virgin, this didn’t bother him as much as we would hope wh n he took his turn.

      But dumb people get caught, so now we all know.

      • shirro@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Yeah, but if those low IQ dudes wanted to overthrow democracy and they wanted to tell other low IQ dudes about it they could just shout it out real loud. The media will ignore it. Law enforcement will do nothing. The courts will do nothing. The public will do nothing.

        How people have reacted doesnt make sense to me. Like the only reason people would “joke” about such shit is because they are really fucking serious about it. Its a declaration of intent being broadcast to like minded people.

        When the president of the US “jokes” about being a king my reading is a constitutional crisis is more of a when than an if.

  • modifier@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 days ago

    It is going very poorly here folks. There isn’t any other way to say it, except to say it more accurately, which is that it is going about as badly as it has ever gone and seems on a trajectory for going as badly as it is possible to go.

  • kevincox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    The government is too big, why are we paying for healthcare, school, welfare and whatever else? It is unfair to those who don’t use those services.

    …oh, except roads and the military, everyone must pay for those.

    It’s amazing how many of these policies are posed as a simple fair rule (people should pay for what they want, not have the government decide where spending goes) but in actuality is just a convenient excuse for dismantling institutions that they personally don’t like.