• assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          16 hours ago

          That sounds like a democrat problem. It sounds like they should have ran a candidate that was actually popular rather than forcing through the disliked senile old man that backed a genocide before switching to his tarnished by proximity understudy. But of course the democrats are not a serious party.

            • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              What if they don’t have a better alternative? Is there a rule against pointing out problems without immediately having a solution?

              • jj4211@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                As discourse goes, it’s fine to point out problems, but also of limited usefulness without an alternative. In fact, it can be outright harmful if it “let’s the perfect be the enemy of the good”. Or at least perhaps “let’s the perfect be the enemy of the at least they aren’t Nazis”

                • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  No one is suggesting fascism as an alternative to democracy. But fascism isn’t the root of the problem, it’s a symptom. Trump didn’t put himself in power, he was elected. Trump isn’t the root cause, and if we refuse to focus on anything other than the republican party we won’t be able to find the root case. And without knowing the root cause it’s hopeless to look to a solution.