• assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    16 hours ago

    That sounds like a democrat problem. It sounds like they should have ran a candidate that was actually popular rather than forcing through the disliked senile old man that backed a genocide before switching to his tarnished by proximity understudy. But of course the democrats are not a serious party.

      • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        What if they don’t have a better alternative? Is there a rule against pointing out problems without immediately having a solution?

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          As discourse goes, it’s fine to point out problems, but also of limited usefulness without an alternative. In fact, it can be outright harmful if it “let’s the perfect be the enemy of the good”. Or at least perhaps “let’s the perfect be the enemy of the at least they aren’t Nazis”

          • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            No one is suggesting fascism as an alternative to democracy. But fascism isn’t the root of the problem, it’s a symptom. Trump didn’t put himself in power, he was elected. Trump isn’t the root cause, and if we refuse to focus on anything other than the republican party we won’t be able to find the root case. And without knowing the root cause it’s hopeless to look to a solution.