• AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Only if you have a TV. Theoretically, you need one to stream the BBC/ITV and such on a computer/phone, but the onus is not on you to prove that you didn’t. You’ll get letters asking to confirm that you don’t need a licence, and then threats of an inspection to make sure you don’t have a TV that’s on and being used to watch TV, though I’m not sure if they follow through with the latter. (In the analogue days, they had detector vans that either could detect TV tuners tuned to channels or were a bluff to get people to pay up, though they seem to have given up on that.)

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Ah interesting, here in Switzerland the rule was if you have a capable device that’s enough. They didn’t have to prove usage.

      And now that they also stream online, any computer and smartphone counts. So they recently changed the rules to just charge every household.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The detector vans were real, and they weren’t a bluff, but the tech they used wasn’t some high tech signal detector. The secret is that they just pointed a parabolic microphone (possibly a laser microphone at a later time) at your window and listened for the audio. The operator would flip through TV channels in his van and try to match the audio from your house to the audio from a currently broadcasting TV station. That was sufficient to determine if someone was watching broadcast tv or not.

    • MY_ANUS_IS_BLEEDING@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 hours ago

      They don’t follow up on the threats - or at least not regularly. (9 years and counting here - even if I somehow get caught and fined the max amount I’ve still saved money)