• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      51
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Are they? Are they really? Puerto Rico still isn’t allowed to be it’s own state

      Downvoters somehow missing the point where Puerto Ricans are basically treated as second class citizens because of where they live. Puerto Rico should be it’s own state already

      • atempuser23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        21 hours ago

        What a weird place this instance is.
        The explanation for those not in the know.

        Puerto Ricans are USA citizens they can vote for president but They can not vote on the president from Puerto Rico. They are natural born US citizens can’t vote for president in the place of their birth. This is because of many reasons.

        So they have to move and become residents of not Puerto Rico, but a different state, to vote for president.

        So they do not have the same rights as other US citizens because of where they live. This is unique in the united states.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I mean, it’s not because they’re Puerto Rican, it’s because they live in Puerto Rico. Someone from Iowa who moved to Puerto Rico would also not get a vote.
          This is because our system allocates votes to land, not people.
          US citizens don’t get to vote for president. They get to vote for who their place of residence votes for.

          Up until the 60s, people in DC also didn’t get a vote, because by default only states get a vote, and it’s explicitly not a state.

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Are they? Are they really?

        Yes they really are. They are U.S. citizens who are disenfranchised based on location.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Yeah, maybe it wasn’t entirely clear there but I was trying to say that they were treated as second class citizens that can pay taxes but can’t vote becit of where they live

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            You do know that has nothing to do with being of Puerto Rican ethnicity, right? It has to do with living on Puerto Rico. You can be a citizen of Indonesian descent who lives on Puerto Rico and you still can’t vote for president. But that person, and all of the other U.S. citizens making up the population of Puerto Rico can just hop on a plane or a boat and come to the continental U.S. (or even Hawaii or Alaska), no passport needed, move there without any immigration issues, and vote in the next presidential election.

            It doesn’t matter what your ethnicity is.

            You also can’t vote for president if you live on American Samoa or Guam.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        ·
        2 days ago

        They are still U S. citizens, just not citizens of any state. Same thing can happen if you are born in DC or a military base not in a state.

        American Samoans are the ones that really get screwed. They are just U S. nationals. All the responsibilities of citizens (including the draft when it exists) but not all of the benefits.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          It was kind of my point that they were treated as second class citizens, like Samoans, just because of where they were born. Puerto Rico should be it’s own state already

          • bss03@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I think maybe the text of your post did not convey that sentiment, particularly given the reliability of Poe’s Law. Perhaps in the future, you might include a visible indicator that you are using satire?

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Puerto Rican statehood is more complicated than that. Becoming a state is a contentious issue even amongst Puerto Ricans.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Is it?

          I had friends there for a long time, they all basically either wanted the US out or had it be a US state, anything but this in between nothing that they’re in now

            • don@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              16 hours ago

              A 2019 Gallup poll found 83% of Democrats in the US, but only 35% of Republicans, supported Puerto Rican statehood. A 2020 survey by International Policy Digest found that “The majority of Democrats showed support for statehood for both D.C. (61.8%) and Puerto Rico (69.7%)” while among Republicans, only 26.7% supported D.C. statehood and 34.8% supported Puerto Rican statehood.

              That speaks volumes.