• Dr Jekell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    They really shot themselves in the foot by going straight to phones.

    The better way would have been to work on tablets first and working out all the bugs on larger devices with a limited feature set before moving into phones with the attendant issues of regional cell bands and restrictions.

    • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      tablets (especially ones that could be flashed with Linux, i.e. not iPads) are way less common than smartphones, so you get fewer devices to choose from for testing, fewer users who can run it, report bugs, and support the project, and less interest in general.

      • Dr Jekell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The hardware isn’t so much of a problem as there are companies who can make or source compatible tablets like the PineTab2 and the PineNote.

        It’s making the software compatible with a lower power mobile device and learning what needs to fixed.

        It would have been much easier to deal with getting a tablet up and running before dealing with getting a mobile device functional.

        Making the small steps from laptop to tablet then to phone would have saved them a lot of grief and software mistakes.