A long read, but fascinating.

  • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The article imply a fraud in the LLMs… Compares it to psychs

    Non sense. They are just tools. One can like them or not

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      No it doesn’t. It doesn’t claim they’re frauds. It claims that people are seeing things in them that aren’t there and giving them abilities they don’t have. I don’t think you read it all the way through.

      • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I did, and I believe the author is the one using psych tricks. He tries to persuade readers to see things that are not there. Similar as he claims that the LLMs are doing, he prepares the scene by creating some comparison worded in a way to make them credible. But in practice none of those comparisons are true. They appear true because the author is good with words, and leave to the reader the message that LLMs are frauds. It is a well executed rhetoric exercise, but it is still non sensical. An LLM is just a model that doesn’t try to be intelligent, it tries to answer questions or, better, to complete text

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Again, it’s not about what the model tries to be. It’s about what people perceive it to be. I don’t know how you can say you read the whole article when you keep claiming it’s saying something it isn’t saying.

        • JoBo@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you read it all the way through, you didn’t comprehend any of it. Maybe work on that and try again.