I definitely do not want to support this practice, but there’s no way to filter these out 😠.

  • Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I very much understand the misgivings about this, and certain parts make me uncomfortable with it, too. But this could be revolutionary for media accessibility, and in my mind could easily be worth it for the ability to make new media immediately accessible to folks with vision challenges, deaf and hard of hearing individuals, and a lot of other folks for whom most media is not easily interactive/accessible. For many people in this situation, you wait months after a traditional version of something is published before an accessible version is released, if it ever is. Often, it’s just not seen as worth a publisher’s time to make their content accessible to an audience they don’t see as significantly profitable.

    Like the printing press took jobs from scribes, but had far more significant impacts democratizing information and education, so might AI in the long run.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      But this could be revolutionary for media accessibility, and in my mind could easily be worth it for the ability to make new media immediately accessible to folks with vision challenges, deaf and hard of hearing individuals, and a lot of other folks for whom most media is not easily interactive/accessible

      As an accessibility add-on / upgrade to standard TTS, sure. Sounds great, even. But I will not accept soulless, robotic, AI-generated voices for something being sold as an audiobook. I just won’t.

      • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        “I will not accept soulless robotic machine-generated typescript being sold as a book. I just won’t.” -Some hipster arguing against the printing press

        Not denying audiobook performers don’t have real valuable talent (and should be fairly paid for it), but when was the last time you paid a premium for a handwritten novel?

      • The Pantser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        What about if we sweeten the deal and allow you to choose the voice actor on the fly? Want Star wars novels read by James Earl Jones, or Tolkien read by Arnold Schwarzenegger? You can have that with AI voices.

        • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Lol, there is no sweetening the deal. Every one of those is a lost job opportunity for an actual voice actor.

          • The Pantser@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Except many books get read by the author or never get read at all so it opens new opportunities for people who wouldn’t ever use audio books or books who never will get audio version now vision impaired people have the option to hear them.

            • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              TTS already exists for the visually impaired. Amazon can use AI voices for that all they want (they’re better than the default TTS now). Just don’t sell me an “audiobook” that’s not read by a person.