A lot of people point to trains efficiency as a way forward to minimize the environmental impact of the transportation sector. But are trains and railroad solarpunkable? Or is it just another “all eggs in the same basket” industry?

  • francisco@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yea, urban trains can work really well. With somewhat overlapping services.

    But for longer distances i don’t really understand why today’s fares are higher than using a car share between 2 people. I’ve seen that kind of pricing weirdness in Portugal, Spain, England and France, and that does not sound efficient at all.

    • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issue with cars is that they cost a lot in taxes, insurance, loss of value of the car and upkeep, which adds up to a lot of money. With a cheap car you are talking 500€/month or 50Cent/km and more for more expensive ones. Basicly all public transport passes are under 500€/month many are significantly cheaper. That does not include parking, which is rightly expensive in cities, as parking spots could also be housing and so forth. That alone can make public transport cheaper. Long distance trains including hsr are often relativly cheap, if booked early enough.

      People tend to underestimate car costs a lot.

      • francisco@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, you make some very valid points on underestimating the costs of a car. But even at 50c/km, that compares with 10c/(km.person) on a train. On the other side of the competition, long/medium distance trains are more expensive than airplanes. What’s up with that? Look at France legislating to favour trains. So I ask myself if it is even possible to get around those centralisation issues with a more DIY fashion.

        • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          In the EU there are no taxes whatsortever on aviation fuel. Furthermore airlines get free emission certificates for every flight. For international flights you do not pay VAT in the EU and only seven European countries have ticket taxes.

          Pretty easy to see why rail has a problem in competing. The good part is that aviation fuel taxes are supported by most members and are in the work, the Comission is proposing to cut the free certificates. VAT remains a problem thou.

          • francisco@slrpnk.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Did not know that. Thanks for the info.

            It still surprises me that a 300km train ticket costs about the same per person as taking a car with 2 people paying fuel and highway tolls. A 600 seat optimized ‘car’ on a dedicated low friction track should be, maybe, 100x cheaper.

            • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              In Kazahkstan you can get 1329km train journey for $18.40. That is not uncommon in poorer countries at all to be around $2 for 100km. So I presume it is higher wages. At the same time energy is incredibly cheap today, so the optimization with low friction does not help much.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The high prices are mainly a result of the push for high-speed trains that are exponentially more expensive to built and operate than regular speed trains. And to make things worse… the push for high-speed trains has resulted in the decommissioning of a lot of regional regular speed lines, meaning that now often you have to make a detour with a high-speed train to reach the same destination, and thus you are not actually faster at all.

    • Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      But for longer distances i don’t really understand why today’s fares are higher than using a car share between 2 people.

      Fuel is heavily subsidized, trains are not. When you get a full tank you’re actually paying only part of the real price.

      Additionally, people tend to underestimate how much owing a car costs. City nerd has a video about it.

      • francisco@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Will look for that city nerd.

        Fuel is heavily subsidized, trains are not.

        How do these subsidies work, that the rail companies cannot tap into those. The electrified trains have most of their electricity coming from fossil fuels which would benefit from the same subsidies.

        I feel that an optimised engine on a low friction track carrying 500-1000 people should be orders of magnitude cheaper than a car.