The companies who operate the docks aren’t refusing to provide services, so it would’ve make sense chosing them. The two unions organising people who work at the ports have chosen not to unload Tesla cars, as a sympathy strike. Which is their right according to Swedish law.
The can file the suit but nothing will Come of it, since it’s not the companies taking action against tesla it’s the unions they have signed contracts with, if they have unionised workers
Sure but the company can still be found not hiring their contract and fined accordingly. If unions continously repeat this eventually the company would go bankrupt as no one would want to work with that company.
From what I understand there is no law saying they have to but there is a law allowing other unions to strike against them if they choose not to.
The question here is that this is a public service offered by government and I think courts are right in stating that Postnord (a government owned company) must find a way to fulfill its obligations or be fined which in practice is a fine to government and its people.
A lengthy post on Twitter (I refuse to call it X, especially since it’s still twitter.com ffs), mentions
https://twitter.com/NicklasNilsso14/status/1727417222488846528
Is that true? Can they sue other companies/agencies for not providing services, like those responsible for manning the shipping docks?
It’s true, that’s why it’s called an agreement.
The companies who operate the docks aren’t refusing to provide services, so it would’ve make sense chosing them. The two unions organising people who work at the ports have chosen not to unload Tesla cars, as a sympathy strike. Which is their right according to Swedish law.
The can file the suit but nothing will Come of it, since it’s not the companies taking action against tesla it’s the unions they have signed contracts with, if they have unionised workers
Sure but the company can still be found not hiring their contract and fined accordingly. If unions continously repeat this eventually the company would go bankrupt as no one would want to work with that company.
From what I understand there is no law saying they have to but there is a law allowing other unions to strike against them if they choose not to.
The question here is that this is a public service offered by government and I think courts are right in stating that Postnord (a government owned company) must find a way to fulfill its obligations or be fined which in practice is a fine to government and its people.
You spent a quarter of your time typing complaining about X vs Twitter.
Yeah it’s their right, and it’s the right of the unions to strike and for other unions to join in solidarity.
It’s the free market, welcome to capitalism.
That’s the point though the postal workers are not striking they are denying service to a particular customer