I mean, I’m not saying that there was any corruption or explicit instruction to give them a penalty, but even the minor thought that a certain club’s state-owners might pay me/hire me more often can be incredibly enticing.

  • Rascha-Rascha@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yes, 100%. This is what a lot of doctors/surgeons get paid and they have to do like a decade of study and have people’s lives in their hands, so yes. To jog around a bit, blow a whistle, and have the best view of football of literally any non-player, yes, 120k sounds like theft.

    • HakuChikara83@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      You can’t compare what football earns to what doctors and nurses get paid. We just go back to having a go at what everyone earns in football the and the non footballing fan saying that it’s a disgrace what footballers earn for kicking a ball around. Refs are an integral part of the football setup and should be paid accordingly.

      • Rascha-Rascha@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I can and I will. You’re talking about risks and repercussions in work, there are many, many jobs where the risks are far worse than what a referee risks. Police, who get paid less, how much do they risk? There are mundane jobs where people don’t get paid much but the regulatory and compliance environment means they risk jail time if they mess up. Builders, plumbers, electricians, mechanics, all of these jobs, if they do something wrong they risk financially and legally. If you don’t fit a seatbelt or a tire or a break pad right as a mechanic and that ends up killing someone in an accident, you risk literal fucking jail time. So again, give me 120k to jog around for 180 odd minutes every week with a bunch of overpaid wankers and I’ll take it every day.

        You wanted to talk about salaries and what the job is and now you don’t because you realised your argument was a bit dumb, but no, I’m sorry, they get paid plenty and looking at their performances I’d say they deserve less.

        • MattJFarrell@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s not just about what they “deserve”. It’s staving off corruption, and also attracting top talent to the job. The weak talent pool we have for officials at the top level is clearly evidence of that. You can afford to pay someone shit wages in retail because you can always throw a new body in there when you burn out the others. Not so with refs, it takes years to train up a PL level ref.

          And to be clear, I advocate for higher wages for the officials, but hand in hand with greater consequences for huge errors like we’ve seen.

          • Rascha-Rascha@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            The idea that higher wages prevents corruption is false. Only checks and balances will do that, and football has very few.