It seems to me like one of those decisions where 50% of VAR teams would give the penalty and 50% would overturn it. How do you fairly judge a situation like that?
It seems to me like one of those decisions where 50% of VAR teams would give the penalty and 50% would overturn it. How do you fairly judge a situation like that?
If it’s not clear and obvious then the onfield decision must stand, that’s been the “selling point” of VAR since before it was introduced when there were some justified fears that games would be over-officiated.