sodium_nitride [she/her, any]

  • 4 Posts
  • 16 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: March 12th, 2025

help-circle


  • Point 1

    The mRNA vaccines for COVID-19, which have now been administered several billion times, have been heavily scrutinized for safety and have been shown to be extremely safe, said Joseph Wu, MD, PhD, the director of the Stanford Cardiovascular Institute.

    Vaccine-associated myocarditis occurs in about one in every 140,000 vaccinees after a first dose and rises to one in 32,000 after a second dose. For reasons that aren’t clear, incidence peaks among male vaccinees age 30 or below, at one in 16,750 vaccinees.

    Direct quote from your source. All it says is that in some people it can cause a little heart tissue damage.

    Point 2:

    If you wish to abolish the prison system then I am OK with that. If you ain’t wishing to do that I’m not even sure what your position is and I doubt it would be coherent in any way.

    Point 3:

    Blud … you brought up “red and blue”


  • How many people died from the vaccine after being coerced into taking it?

    None. Since when the fuck do mRNA vaccines kill people? Hell even older vaccines have negligible mortality.

    You can’t force people to do anything. You can’t tell them what to do and expect them to listen.

    You can. What do you think the legal system is?

    Real deaths creating permanent divide between the red and blue.

    Red and blue? Brother, I’m not American nor have I ever even been to America. I don’t subscribe to either side of your political aile.




  • China is not communist. But we should talk about different economic systems because that’s the ultimate goal.

    Communism in itself is a true ideal as long as output exceeds intake and satisfaction is high. It’s also possible on a global scale, if not designed for it.

    Capitalism is also a true ideal as long as it’s built on an immovable foundation of human rights paid for by centralized non profit corporations.

    This is accurate enough and largely in line with modern communist theory although lacking in detail (why did you get my hopes up to dash them?)

    The issue is and always has been the concentration of power.

    No it’s not, unless you are talking about literal electrical/mechanical power (engineers of the world, unite!).

    Sociological power is a poorly defined concept with a nebulous effect on society.

    Economic power, while more defined isn’t a cause but an effect of the organisation of production (and thus, whether a society is feudal, capitalist, socialist or communist).

    And totally tyrannical in their wielding of power against free thought, sex, religion, etc. It’s practically anti freedom and contradicts every protected class we have in the US.

    Not at all lmao. LGBTQ rights are about the only ones the Chinese are a bit lagging on. The rest are fine.

    And before you come at me about freedom of speech, that is nothing more than the freedom for the rich to buy the public opinion. You don’t want to live in such a society, cause then you get Elon buying twitter and Trump buying the US.

    Even if you’re pro choice, the piles of discarded fetuses could reach skyscraper height. This is not a normal issue to have.

    Bruh … what the fuck are you talking about?

    Also pro-tip, you can just Google the stats. Here it is. China is number 66.

    If the question is what system would you be willing to put your life in the hands of, there is only one answer:

    Selfish answer: the one that gives me tons of money and protection (imagine a dictatorship of the transfemmes)

    Non-selfish answer: a dictatorship of the proletariat cause I’m a proletariat and so are most people


  • I know it’s popular in the west these days to attribute anything that goes wrong in their countries as being Russia’s fault, but this level of paranoia is genuinely absurd and funny. Like seriously, Putin is personally ordering Russian spies to … do arson attacks on random IKEA stores?

    Although attribution is often difficult, and some incidents will have nothing to do with Russia

    One would think that the statement that follows this would be something like “on occasion, conclusive evidence has been found of Russian spies committing petty acts of vandalisim”, or something like that. But no, there isn’t even a pretense of there being any sort of evidence in this article. It just says “it is clear”, and vaguely references a UK intelligence officer (what a trustworthy source!)

    Unlike the USSR, Putin’s Russia is essentially post-ideological.

    Meaningless statement (post-ideology does not exist), and also demonstrably false given that Putin very openly adopts a Christian and a nationalist position/policy.

    hard-left anticapitalism

    Ah, so it’s that thing where the self-proclaimed “moderates” pretend that everyone who opposes them and their socio-economic agenda is secretly a Russian agent. Got it.

    such as the placing of cameras along Polish railway lines on which aid to Ukraine flows.

    Mixing incidents of what are likely legitimate spying with random petty crime does not mean that the random petty crime was also some Russian plot.

    It also contributes to another Kremlin (and, indeed, Chinese) talking point, that removed western democracies simply don’t work.

    The poverty and dysfunction of western societies is not the fault of the scary foreign boogeymen.

    This also highlights another virtue of this new strategy for the Kremlin: it encourages and mobilises our own paranoia.

    Lmao the article itself is fueling this paranoia.

    The answer was — and is — not to let that panic us or force a change in policy: to keep calm and carry on.

    This is something Europeans are failing spectacularly at.



  • At the end of the day, the electoral system is a contest of strength between 2 or more cults of personality. This is more prevalent in some countries than other, but the very basic aspect of representative “democracy”, aka elections (selecting a person to rule) basically boils down to giving a few people the power to make decisions for everybody else. It’s dictatorial by nature.