attempts on presidents’ lives are not rare in US history
And that’s why the Secret Service is as comprehensive as it is. Ultimately, the democracy responds to problems.
attempts on presidents’ lives are not rare in US history
And that’s why the Secret Service is as comprehensive as it is. Ultimately, the democracy responds to problems.
The Geneva conventions do not contain the level of protection for civilians that you think.
In particular, Israel has ratified and is a party to the conventions of 1949. After much debate in 1949, those conventions ultimately allowed things like indiscriminate carpet bombing of cities (which the US practiced extensively in the previous war).
Later protocols from 1977 added more civilian protections more along the lines you propose. These protocols banned carpet bombing and introduced the concept of proportionate response into the conventions.
Israel and the United States have not ratified the 1977 protocols 1 and 2 concerning additional civilian protections. According to the text itself, they are not bound by the provisions if they do not agree.
Some research earlier today suggested that some specific model may even have alkaline batteries, which are less thermal runaway-ey than lithium ions.
I’m just seriously impressed that someone could get enough explosive into the package and still have a functional pager that didn’t set off alarms.
There’s a lot of ways to make one metal shard levitate.
I still support the UAPDA, to provide an explicitly legal pathway to disclose any illegal programs that may or may not have existed. And to establish a right of eminent domain over any UAP artifacts that may or may not exist.
This is missing a “just right” image for reference, and so everyone can criticize the author’s cookie preferences.
Uranium doesn’t usually glow in the dark? If you can see a blue glow, you need to get the heck out of there, or submerge it in a lot of water.
Well you see, every February is egg laying season, and he needs those warm sandy beaches to incubate his spawn.
Usually, he can just go down to Galveston and get what he needs. But that year was a very, very special case. It’s not easy being cold blooded.
Used to be, you could correlate the message timestamps with Fox News programming, and get a pretty good idea of what set him off.
SpaceX is beating the pants off every other domestic launch provider unfortunately. All because Musk took some fantastic risks with his own money, and they paid off handsomely. And the worst part is SpaceX is a private company: no public shareholders to keep Musk in check.
You may have heard about ULA having a wee bit of trouble with some capsule thrusters. They have lost some truly epic amounts of money on that program.
Trump is only entitled to ex-President and candidate protection. It’s a lower tier of protection with fewer resources expended.
Actually I think the world population is such that you need to add one or two bits.
Cheese Kurds would be a little cannibalistic.
Fracking has granted the United States independence from OPEC, and turned the US into the largest exporter of oil. The US now has the pricing power on the world oil market. This has huge geopolitical implications.
Back in the 2000s it was completely different. All of the geopolitical wonks were pushing renewable energy as a means of OPEC independence. And now that independence has been granted, but we still have the oil.
Meanwhile, as others have stated on this thread, the immediate problems from fracking have been mostly fixed, including the earthquakes. Long term, I don’t think anyone knows what’s going to happen with all of that dirty wastewater going back into the ground.
So on balance, there’s a good reason for the leadership in both parties to be on board with fracking: oil still rules the world, and fracking lets the United States rule the oil markets.
This is the only way to legally vote by remote electronics in Texas. Must be registered in Harris County. And must be voting from outer space.
Now known as Cavazos. The country decided to maybe not name bases after traitorous losers.
Upvote for correct grammatical number.
Airplanes are usually limited to land at only around half of the total weight they can take off with.
This isn’t normally a problem for normal trips.
If they went to a higher landing weight, the landing gear struts would have to be designed quite a bit stronger. This would make the landing gear heavier, and that would reduce the useful payload weight in the plane.
Not sure the tank periscope system was properly accounted for, either.
None of the current ICBM platforms were designed for missile defense. Missile defense simply did not exist at the time.
Sentinel is busting its budget because it’s renovating and rebuilding all of the ground segments: all of those decrepit silos and computer systems. It’s still money well spent in my opinion.
Missile guidance is not a computationally hard problem, and it hasn’t changed much since the 50s. Terminal missile defense is a fantastically hard problem, and wasn’t mastered until the last decade or two. And the current generation missile defense capabilities still haven’t all been demonstrated in combat.
Having said that, I would generally expect NATO’s missiles to work as advertised in a hot war. And I would plan for Russia’s missiles to be somewhat less effective than they advertise, but still a credible threat.
Technically I think that’s still “put us first on the search bar” money. You’re giving the real under-the-table explanation.