It really does depend on how many those “many people” are. Too many to dismiss them as irrelevant, it appears to me.
Recovering skooma addict.
It really does depend on how many those “many people” are. Too many to dismiss them as irrelevant, it appears to me.
When I looked at bsky it seemed to be about 60% pointing out stupid shit that Trumpists have recently said and done, and 30% self-congratulatory talk about how popular bluesky is this week.
You may be willing to cede the cartoon frog to the Nazis for their exclusive use, but many people aren’t. If you assume that everyone you see using it is one you’ll be vastly overestimating the number of Nazis in the world.
All the talk about the xz affair seems incongruous with the focus on automated scanners. Correct me if I’m wrong here but I don’t think any of them are going to detect something like that.
Money is not capitalism. You can have money without capitalism, as the whole world did for most of recorded history.
the study suggests that individuals who deviate from their party norms are quickly treated as if they are a political enemy.
Is that “party” as in political party? Because I don’t know about the rest of the world, but in Canada it seems like the main polarization is between the Conservatives who have their shiny new Conservative party on one side, versus everybody else who doesn’t really have an official party they identify with all that much on the other side. It’s not yet like the USA with its seemingly-eternal two-party system. I wonder if it looks like that if you view it through Twitter.
In terms of energy produced, triple the nuclear generation would equal about 20% of Canada’s current use of fossil fuels. If population growth continues at 2% (which is slower than it’s been recently) and per capita energy use declines a little, it might be roughly one third of the additional new energy production expected to be demanded by 2050.
Much time has passed since Canada was a “nuclear technology leader.” If it’s to become one again it will be a very long journey.
Factiverse’s success rate is around 80%
That seems pretty close to useless even if we assume that the criteria they’ve used to define success are spot on. Funny how they don’t mention it until the second to last paragraph.
Step 1: Get magic rocks.
Step 2: Now design the rest of the nuclear reactor.
And then there’s Lemmy, where you can always count on some helpful stranger who’s completely missed the point chiming in to tell you why you’re wrong.
That’s not how it was as of yesterday when I signed up just to see what all the fuss was about. (I don’t think I’ll be participating.)
Bluesky: You are immediately and automatically welcomed into the warm embrace of an algorithm that entices you into a parasocial relationship with the synthetic community it has created.
Mastodon: If you’re lucky you’ll stumble across a warm welcome for new users explaining how posts are called toots here, likes are called florps, and our version of Grok is called Garfiald.
It’s the culture of an instance that makes the difference, not which software it runs, but there is often a correlation. Misskey tends to get more people who appreciate cute emoji and comfy vibes.
Calculator is next. What does the CE button do? That depends on what the AI thinks you want it to do.
I’ve just looked again and it’s working normally now.
Thanks Jerry, just wanted to report it since it seems a little different than the usual federation problems. The server does have the messages, they just don’t show up in the view.
I’ll think about it as soon as it’s available on F-Droid.
I thought maybe it was just my imagination that it’s been really slow since Wednesday, but you can see it clearly on the charts at the bottom of the page there.
Maximum rationalisation mode: Maybe Conservatives will now be so confident that they’ve already won the next election that those of them who are just feigning the hate for trans people, gays, immigrants, refugees, socialists, liberals, opponents of fascism, and whatever other scapegoats they can find in order to win popular support will feel that they can safely tone it down a little and just coast to victory without needing to stir up even more fear and anger.
Yeah, total energy according to 2023 EIA figures and to be clear what I meant to say was that tripling nuclear would mean adding an amount equal to 20% of the current total of fossil fuels. The higher efficiency of e.g. electric transport does make some difference there, but all the fossil fuel use does need replacing somehow (the article was explicitly talking about “net zero” goals) and in optimistic scenarios that’s in large part through greatly increased electric generation.