Please, I’ve provided enough context at every stage to be clearly understood. What is regarded and by whom as medicine is not the same as recommending something as complementary to other medicine.
The problem with your post is here -
hypnotherapy is generally accepted as a mechanism to treat certain conditions (which it appears to be in various quarters of traditional medicine)
It does not treat anything directly. It can help in as much as painkillers can help. That’s it. The way you have framed it makes it appear to be more than that.
From your link -
When used therapeutically, it can be thought of as “guided daydreaming”.
Being very good at helping people relax, overcome fears and reduce anxiety is absolutely beneficial when used alongside medical procedure.
That does not mean it is medical procedure and nothing you have linked to suggests otherwise.
From your other link -
In the UK, hypnotherapists do not have to have any specific training by law.
This means hypnotherapy can be offered by people with little training who are not health professionals.
I used a form of hypnotherapy to stop smoking, so I’m not against the use of it. But it didn’t “make” me stop, it helped me to stop because I wanted to stop and because I believed it could help. Which is a very powerful tool in that scenario, as shown by my never having smoked since and not having any side effects or cravings at all after the session. Over seventeen years ago.
I have over egged my objections to your post somewhat because I feel very strongly about the way in which we present information over social media. I don’t think I need tell you why that’s important.
Just don’t tell people hypnotherapy can fix them. And make it clear that isn’t what you are saying. Please.
They also misspelled “massive increase to fossil fuel production and prices” as “shift to electric vehicles and natural gas.”